The content within contains potential spoilers, kindly read at your own description
QUOTE
But Dumbledore came in second in the books as well. But in this case, being in second place was preferential to being first. Voldemort used killing curses and dark magic against Dumbledore... Dumbledore refused to use such methods and Voldemort saw this as a weakness. In the books, Voldemort is at first afraid of Dumbledore, but begins to mock him (as he does in the movies) because he 'seeks not to kill him'. Voldemort is afraid of Dumbledore not because of his power, but because of his knowledge. Dumbledore knows Voldemort's past and that scares Voldemort. Dumbledore, yes, can hold his own against Lord Voldemort but he clearly came in second place both in the books and the movies because of his choice not to use deadlier force. If Fawkes hadn't swooped in on Dumbledore and swallowed the AK, Dumbledore most likely would have been killed. In the book he is attacked simultaneously with a snake and an AK, without help, Voldemort (due to darker deadlier magic) would have killed Dumbledore.. placing Dumbledore in second
I beg to differ on that one. In the book, the duel may not have ended in a result, but there was a clear edge in Dumbledore's favour, but like Capricorn pointed out, in the movie Dumbledore clearly came second. In the book, after being thwarted by Dumbledore, he decided to possess Harry, in the movie he didn't seem that "thwarted" to me. I'll quote the final moments of the battle scene from the book
QUOTE
Fawkes swooped down in front of Dumbledore, opened his beak wide and swallowed the jet of green light whole: he burst into flame and fell to the floor, small, wrinkled and flightless. At the same moment, Dumbledore brandished his wand in one long, fluid movement — the snake, which had been an instant from sinking its fangs into him, flew high into the air and vanished in a wisp of dark smoke; and the water in the pool rose up and covered Voldemort like a cocoon of molten glass.
For a few seconds Voldemort was visible only as a dark, rippling, faceless figure, shimmering and indistinct upon the plinth, clearly struggling to throw off the suffocating mass — '
Then he was gone and the water fell with a crash back into its pool, slopping wildly over the sides, drenching the polished floor.
'MASTER!' screamed Bellatrix.
Sure it was over, sure Voldemort had decided to flee, Harry made to run out from behind his statue guard, but Dumbledore bellowed: 'Stay where you are, Harry!'
.....
(Chapter 36: The only one he ever feared: Order of the Phoenix)
From this it is evident that Tom was unable to dominate Dumbledore at any given point of time and thus decided to attack Harry. In the movie, it was quite different and like you mentioned Tom, Dumbledore came second. This of course did grated quite a bit and took away a lot from what could have been an even better sequence.
QUOTE
You can see the defeat on Voldemort's face that he simply cannot get the better of Dumbledore using those means. The facial expression of Voldemort says it all. He looks angry and disappointed, then he moves to possess Harry. I saw the difference in Dumbledore when Harry was possessed. He is fierce and powerful in the fight, yet solemn and desperate when Harry is possessed.
Yes to an extent yes, but in the book, Dumbledore was never knocked on to his feet while Tom remained standing as you may see from the quote above. Those differences do not make the scene any better in my opinion.
QUOTE
It's interesting, isnt it, the difference that two people can see in one scene
Wouldn't world be boring place if everyone agreed on everything

[\spoiler]