Aww you guys are great! All of your anwers are really good!! Im so proud of you... ok im gushing, don't blame me, blame the 48 hours and no sleep...
anyway..Hello Reecy13! welcome...we are currently talking about..hang on...what are we talking about..o yes, a possible hidden side to dumbledore, and some other questions, oh and the ongoing discussion about phoenixes.
HILLY!!! you came back to us..
right...I dont know if i can quite top everybody else answers...but heres what i think for mt question;
QUOTE
Do you think Dumbledore has a hidden side to his personality, and what is this hidden side like?
...ok, so i think that one of the main reasons that many people like Dumbledore is because he is so open and inviting in most aspects of his life- that is, he shows people what he is like, tells them what he thinks, and does it in a good way. Because of this, it is often difficult to think of the actual things that he may hide. This is also one of the reasons that the why did DD trust snape question is so difficult to solve- because DD kept very few things hidden.
now, i agree with what Drinotonks said-
I think he has a great deal of regret in his soulas well as-
the success of others such as Harry pleases himand these two aspects are very important if we are to understand why he is the way he is. Like Hilly said, there is not that much of a hidden side to him, you do just have to look deeper for some things. He obviously feels happy when those that he loves are happy. He shows it in not only the way he reacts- with a small smile or wink, but also in the things that he does. He will do things for other people to make them happy, and in this, he makes himself happy, even if it is subconscious. His regret is also clear, but he feels regret where others may not. He feels regret because he does take it on himself to make everybody happy, even when it is not possible. And when he feels as though he fails, he feels regret, maybe even for trying in the first place, as though it gave false hope.
He is also a loner, for much the same reasons as above. He does feel immense regret of he does something badly, or fails. Because of this he may stay away altogether. Certainly not because he doesn't want to feel that, more because he doesn't want other people to feel bad. He is perpetually selfless.
Ok, so this is turning into a bit of a describe his personality rant...but thats ok. We cant see the hidden side of him if we cant even identify the open side of him!
I thought K.Lupins answer for the hidden side explained very well. We do all have hidden sides to us. Sometimes we want to keep them hidden because they are ours, and are secret, and sometimes we are ashamed of them.
in the case of Dumbledore perhaps we saw his hidden side on the tower before Snape killed him. was it really because of the previous events in the cave? or was it that we finally saw a little bit more of Dumbledore... the vunerable old man that he wasI think DD was ashamed of this side. He spent his whole life helping other people that he could not accept the fact that he was not as strong as he once was. Maybe he failed to even see it. He spent so much time caring for others that he failed to see himself begin to fall.
I think the most hidden- and well hidden- side of DD is greed. Now hang on, before you all attack me. I dont think it is materialistic or really selfish greed. I see him wanting the knowledge that could help him help other, knowledge that would make him satisfied and happy, and knowledge that could make them all a bit more secure. I see him needing to know things. If he doesn't that ignorance would be like showing your back to an ememy. Allowing them a place to hurt you. to creep up on you unawares and gain the advantage, because they see more than you. I can see his need for this knowledge causes him to become extremely stressed, and frustrated.
Now, i dont really think greed is the right word, but it is very difficult to explain. Maybe dependency is the right term. He is dependent on knowing more, maybe not of the minor details, but of the picture as a whole. He is a whole person, whilst others like riddle are detail people. DD did not study all of the details of a picture, but that did not mean he was not aware of them, then imagine if a whole section of that bigger picture was blurred, or not there at all. That must have been immensly frustrating, to know that something is going on but he couldn't know or understand what that was.
This is also shown that night on the astronomy tower personly i believe that he knew what was going on with Snape, and he was pleading with Snape not to hesitate, and to kill DD before anything went wrong. But, before then. I cant remember the exact words, but DD was terrified when he saw the dark mark over the school. He had left the school to do something important, yet had no idea what was happening there, and no way of finding out. He didn't know if his students were hurt, or dead, and he did not know if the Death Eaters were there for him, or for Harry, or for all of them. He did not know how many there were, or how powerful they were. For all he knew, the Dark Lord may have been there himself. he did not know. At this most cruicial time, when he was weak and they were all vunerable, and he did not know. DD could not 'work properly' if he didn't know all of the facts. he needed to know.
That is how we see him, as somebody who knows what is going on, without that he is incomplete.And that was his dependency. His dependency on knowledge.
And really, its a sensible dependency to have.
Drinotonks-
QUOTE
unless you are that person you will never know all of your hidden qualities…
I guess this sums up DDs atitude towards himself. He was so wrapped up in saving everyone else, that he never had time to really search himself and help himself. Its sad, really...
And heres where i contradict myself. Another *possible* hidden side is a side of complete understanding. It goes both ways. Again, he may not have known the detail, but he may have seen everything clearly, a sense of elightenment, if you will. It seems the opposite of my previous answer, and you may ask how two opposites can be experienced by the same person. I dont just think it could be one or the other, i think DD could have had both hidden sides...
When he was less experienced, he may of still been dependant on this knowledge. But, there may have been a time when he saw what he was doing, seeing that he was searching for the impossible, and understood himself. This may have been that night on the A. Tower, or it may have been a few months before, or years, or decades, it may have even been a century ago. But one day, he could have grown to understand himself. To know every fibre of his being, and embrace that as what he was. He may have learnt to nurture what was in front of him, and be thankfull, but not blissfully ignorant. He may have known to search for the truth, but not become absorbed by it. He may have reached his equilibrium. We may never know...
*-*-*-*
QUOTE
I know we don't know enough yet but. What do you think was the iron clad reason Dumbledore trusted snape??
ok, i reached a point where i was drawing so many highly unlikely conclusions that i decided i wouldn't try and work this one out any more. I dont think we are going to guess. even if we did, we wouldn't know we were right until DH came out, and we may dismiss it before then. If we were sure we were right...well that may just spoil the book then...So you wont get much out of me..Sorry! anyway...ive rambled on enough about deep and meaningful things above...

but yes, i do agree that DD wouldn't be fooled by legimency. Even if he was the lesser wizard, i dont think he would instantly trust somebody that is an acomplished legilmens. It is just too irrational.
QUOTE
phoenixes - this really bugs me! i know its sort-of and endless cycle and that they are reborn from their ashes but it is a good question - where do they come from?
grrr...please visit link in
2 previous posts

...NO! Im only joking, seriously!!! I dont even know if it says it in there...
I think the thing is, is that i dont think that Phoenixes have baby phoenixes. I know, everything needs to reproduce, but i just dont think that they do. In fact, legend says that there is only one phoenix. I know DD says Phoenixes were rare, but i dont think he stresses how rare. I mean, think about it, if there was something that could be born and not die, there would be more phoenixes than people. even if it only started with two phoenixes, there would be loads. If they had babies, and none of the babies died...
I Think that Phoenixes are true beings of magic as in they were/it was (depending on whether fawkes is unique or not) born of magic, and that is why it is so resiliant to everything, eg the basilisks eyes etc. They dont die and stay dead, they die and come back, just as magic does, in the form of a new witch or wizard. Phoenixes are undying, just as magic is. They are eternal.
And last note, i would like to award Hilly, Drinotonks and Jade 5 sherbet lemons each for there brilliant (and more to the point than mine

) answers to DDs personality question.
Well Done!!! oh and an extra one for jade because i was sarcastic...(and she gave me fourty

)
adieu!
Clara}~
xxx

xxx
EDIT:OH!!! i also forgot to announce...
February's Dumbledore-ette of the month is...
K.LUPIN_WEREWOLFWith a huge 37!!
second place was seriouslysirius, with 28!! well done guys!!
Please note: this was before todays changes. On the members list, i will have a running total on the left, and this months total on the right, so that we dont have the same winner every month. Here is an example...:
Mr Smith (25) (7)
see? and the person with the most on the right wins the monthly, and the person who wins on the left gets a special congratulations. The left will go up as more points are awarded on the right. does that make sense?
K.Lupin, you have the honour of adding something to your name eg: february Dumbledore-ette of the month, or any variation here of. (if you want to...)
ok, im really going to go now...
EDIT EDIT: or not. I forgot to add, a few pages back somebody said:
i remember fawkes' feather being in Harry's wand but not Voldermort's... but as Fawkes' feather is in Harry's wand i shall agree with my cousin. i think that fawkes will be play a grand role in the next book!i just wanted to say- that is what caused the prio incuntatum or however you say it, the two wands, also remember what olivander said in the wand shop? when its brother gave you that scar...oOooOOooo
ok, going now..