NYT is breaking tradition and is reviewing the book Tomorrow so watch out for spoilers!!!! They are reviewing 2 days early!

That's the New York Times for anyone that doesn't know.

they CANT. If they spoil the ending i'll be mad at the NY times. If they only say "a sad and adventurous tale", and dont give away information, that would be okay. They better not spoil the ending

They are. Here is the link to the Drudge Report MOD EDIT they are reporting NYT is reviewing it tomorrow. There is another link from Drudge to NYT, but beware, there is minor spoilers on the NYT link.

MOD EDIT: Please see my post below. Thanks!

Yes, it contains spoilers. No, it reveals no detailed information, and it definitely does not reveal the ending. It does, though, reveal some small clues as to the contents of the book. So, in effort to guard our spoiler policy, I'm going to remove the link from your post. . .I'm sorry for any inconvenience, but we're trying to keep VTM as spoiler free as possible! Please do not link to the NYT article or any other sites that quote it or "print" it. Thanks!

(Also, if it's any consolation. . .reading the report DOES make me want to read the book all the more, even though it proved one of my theories wrong. . .Ah well. Can't win them all!)

Not trying to spoil anyone, I linked to a site telling about the NYT article, not the article itself. It does make me want to read it more, if that is possible I do think it is wrong for NYT to review it though, the whole world knows JKR doesn't want it out until Fri at midnight!!!!

As per VTM's stance on absolutely no spoils, I'm going to go ahead and close this thread up. I know you haven't said any spoilers, and I think you for that, but I don't want people to be tempted to discuss the NYT article on here. Thanks for your patience and understanding!