Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Death, Thread 3
Veritaserum Forums > General > Archived Threads > The Post-HBP Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
phlow
DD was lifted off the tower...nobody saw him drop down did they? In COS, we know that Fawkes carried harry, ron, professor lockheart and ginny out of the chamber of secrets. For all you know, Fawkes might have just carried DD down safely.
Lews Therin Telamon
IS DUMBLEDORE DEAD? or is he not?

The only problem (I believe) with working this question out is that we don't know what Malfoy was told to do for Voldemort. Maybe he was ordered to do sometihng completely different other than kill Dumbledore. It would be just like JKR to introduce a deuce ex machina like that. The reason this is so important is that Snape isn't dead. He made an Unbreakable Vow, and we know from Ron that if you break one of them, you're gone. If Draco was told to kill Dumbledore, then Dumbledore is dead. End of thread. If Draco was not told to, then maybe Dumbledore is alive, and maybe he's dead.

LTT
hp6
[QUOTE]The only problem (I believe) with working this question out is that we don't know what Malfoy was told to do for Voldemort.

ok i dont know if thats the only problem because snape may not die right there on the spot it could be delayed so if he didnt kill dd and that was what the vow was then he can still die later right?
lilly_P
Perhaps Dumbledore was already dying from the potion that he drank at the cave. Then if Snape knew this and casted the UVow it would put him in the clear as not really killing Dumbldore because the curse was doing it anyway. cool.gif
sorum
QUOTE (Lews Therin Telamon @ Dec 30 2005, 12:35 PM)
IS DUMBLEDORE DEAD? or is he not?

The only problem (I believe) with working this question out is that we don't know what Malfoy was told to do for Voldemort. Maybe he was ordered to do sometihng completely different other than kill Dumbledore. It would be just like JKR to introduce a deuce ex machina like that. The reason this is so important is that Snape isn't dead. He made an Unbreakable Vow, and we know from Ron that if you break one of them, you're gone. If Draco was told to kill Dumbledore, then Dumbledore is dead. End of thread. If Draco was not told to, then maybe Dumbledore is alive, and maybe he's dead.

LTT

I used to be someone who though Dumbledore is alive. But after what she said, I'm starting to think he might have actually have died. However I doubt Draco's mission was to kill Dumbledore. Draco says that he is about to kill him but Dumbledore says something like: my dear boy, if you were to kill me you could have done it long time ago, so lets stop pretending you are going to do it now when we both know just as well you have no intention of doing so.


<(' '<)<(' ')>(>' ')><(' '<)<(' ')>(>' ')><(' '<)<(' ')>(>' ')>
Cali_arg
QUOTE (Auror37 @ Jul 31 2005, 04:35 PM)


2. Now this one is a bit weird, but bear with me. Snape took an Unbreakable Vow, or whatever, saying that he wil protect Malfoy. Now, letting Malfoy become a murderer isn't exactly protecting him, is it? So if this is true, Snape would have died as well for breaking the vow. Dumbledore obvioulsy realizes this and cannot let Snape die because Dumbledore needs him alive.


First of all : Ive been reading and....WOW very interesting ideas and theories people biggrin.gif


About this..interesting....let see : Snape would have broken the vow IF he had let Draco got hurt while "he attempts to fulfil the Drak Lord's wishes" (p.41) so I dont think letting Malfoy kill DD was a way of breaking the vow (we are talking about death eaters) cause in fact ,Draco, should have killed DD ...he had to , it was Voldy's wish ... Snape ended up doing it cause Malfoy coludnt not because he would be breaking the vow by letting him (dr) perfom the curse
Anyway your idea is really interesting

Actually if Malfoy had killed DD he and Snape would be safe(meaning under Voldy's protection ) .But Now they are not safe cause Voldemort wanted Draco to perform the AK course not Snape (although he wanted DD dead)




In the very beggening of the book (Spinner's end) we clearly can see Snape was being a double agent.... but was his loyalty actually in dark side with Voldy ?


I always loved Snape and I dunno whether he is a good or bad guy after all because (like it or not) he had to kill DD .He had more reasons than doing it for Voldemort and the reason might be :Draco... remember he couldnt do it after all so Snape did it and now he needs to protect him from Voldemort cause I think he will be kinda a mad with Draco for not killing DD . Will Voldermort punish Draco although DD is dead?

So getting back to the point Snape had to do it cause of the unbreakable vow too , In other words DD had to die even if Malfoy couldnt kill him


Dumbledore mad a mistake (big one , of course) because he is human and even the greatest wizard has a weaknees

So...lets see
"Severus...please" (page 556) I think that for a moment DD actually thought that Snape wasnt going to kill him cause.....after all he (dd) had done for him...
But Snape did it anyway

I would like to know what the other reasons of DD to trusts Snape were


see u biggrin.gif
**HeRmIoNe**
i've just read the book...here in italy came out the 6th of january..
i couldnt believe Dumbledore is dead...
it's so sad.. sad.gif
Simsez
I don't know if shape is good or bad, but I can read. I chapter 2, you can clearly see snape offering his help to Narcissa: "It might be possible... for me to help Draco." Don't you think that a normal people would think twice before offering his help to kill DD (considering Snape is good), he could have easily go back when Narcissa asked him to make the Unbreakable Vow.

And there is still a part missing, we all know that Draco's task had something to do with DD, but we don't know what exactly did the dark lord told him to do and the Vow is in function of this ... Watch, Protect, doing it for him if he seems to fail ... During the task Voldemort gave him, What is it .... I doutd it was as clear as : Draco go kill Dumbledore.



"You think he is mistaken? Or that I have somehow hoowinked him? Fooled the Dark Lord, the greatest wizard, the most accomplished Legilimens the world have ever seen?"

I don't know if he did, but he surely fooled me. wink.gif
pureblood
DD is not dead and here are my reasons

QUOTE
He told me to do it or he'll kill me. I've got no choice." "He cannot kill you if you are already dead. Come over to the right side Draco, and we can hide you more completely than you can possibly imagine. What is more, I can send members of the Order to your mother tonight to hide her likewise. Nobody would be surprised that you had died in your attempt to kill me -- forgive me, but Lord Voldemort probably expects it. Nor would the Death Eaters be surprised that we had captured and killed your mother -- it is what they would do themselves, after all.


This leads me to believe Dumbledore knew he was going to fake his own death.

QUOTE
Snape raised his wand and pointed it directly at Dumbledore. "Avada Kedavra!" A jet of green light shot from the end of Snape's wand and hit Dumbledore squarely in the chest. Harry's scream of horror never left him; silently he was forced to watch as Dumbledore was blasted into the air. For a split second, he seemed to hang suspended beneath the shining skull, and then he slowly fell backward, like a great rag doll, over the battlements and out of sight.


But when the AV curse is performed people just fall over and die. why all of a sudden would DD fly though the air

[B]Snape is HIGHLY skilled at nonverbal spells. he could have easliy said Avada Kedvra but thought expellarmus and everyone thought it was the AV curse

QUOTE
White smoke spiraled into the air and made strange shapes: Harry thought, for one heart-stopping moment, that he saw a phoenix fly joyfully into the blue, but next second the fire had vanished. (HBP) REMEMBER THIS STATMENT TOO Non-magic people (more commonly known as muggles) were particularly afraid of magic in medieval times, but not very good at recognizing it. On the rare occasion that they did catch a real witch or wizard, burning had no effect whatsoever. The witch or wizard would perform a basic Flame Freezing Charm and then pretend to shriek with pain while enjoying a gentle, tickling sensation.
[/COLOR]

So even if DD was in the tomb him being set on fire does not mean anything. remember he set youg tom riddles clothes on fire. and for all we know fawkes could have been in the tomb since when a phenoix catches fire the burst into flames
Albus
I have done a large-scale analytsis of the book and have found that Dumbledore Isn't Dead. His Phoenix dies and is reborn right? Well It was said that harry thought he saw the phoenix flyinto dumbledores FLAME(White smoke spiraled into the air and made strange shapes: Harry thought, for one heart-stopping moment, that he saw a phoenix fly joyfully into the blue, but next second the fire had vanished). Itmeans that dumbledore died like the phoenix and willl be escorted out by it as a phoenix can travel anywhere (We saw this in the chamber of secrets.) Without Dumbledore book 7 cannot function as only harry knows avout the horxruxes and has no means by which to seek them out. Without Albus we can't find a resolution by which the horcruxes are destroyed thus dumbledore has to be alive to keep the story goind. The phoenix is a great creature and as we aw dumbledore burst into flame as a phoenix does.

Please reply w/ your thoughts on the phoenix theory.

Snape has been evil from th beginning as i have found. He had to save harry in book 1 to build trust w./ dumbledore. His meanness to harry is caused by his pact w/ voldemort. He cant kill harry so he is negative towards him. It was his job to seek post at hogwarts and his wanting the Defense agfainst the dark arts job is due to his ties w. the dark lord. He is sent to Hogwarts to seek out the weaknesses of Dumbledore and to provide all the info he can to voldemort. He has to stay at hogwarts when Voldemort returns to keep his trust w/ dumbledore. If he left than dumbledore would probably be "alive" now and voldemort would hate him for it. It would seem that he stayed out of fear or loyalty to dumbledore but that is false. All these years he has been loyal to voldemort and has been collecting info. If he left to rejoin voldemort when he returned then he would have lost all ties w/ dumbledore and thus he could not get more info.

Please reply to this theory as well.
Mark182
I tihnk it was planned, hagrid tells harry he heard snape and dd argue. Snape said he didn't want to do it anymore. Perhaps he didin't want to go on with the plan, perhaps he didn't want to kill dd

dd sounded angry too when he talked to snape and how often have dd been angry in an argument. The only reason i think he got angry is because it was so important that snape killed him or something close to it. we don't no what snape "doesn't want to do" so it might as well be that.

another thing that makes me think like this is because when dd and harry gets back from the cave he keeps saying that he
"wants severus" ofcourse it might be just because he want's some potion but why the hurry? was dd dying because of what happend in the cave?why was he so urgent to get snape otherwise?

snape's angry expression when he kills dd might be because he hates what he has to do so it's an angry sadness. i think we all have had that feeling.

no I think severus snape is still a good guy and he will have an important part in book 7.
this I belive and have no doubts about, but ofcourse i might be completly wrong;)
my_erised
[COLOR=green]i dont think that dumbledore is still alive. to me that is to out of j.k's realm she has said in several interviewws that she thinks that it is corny to kill people and then have them come back. the only possible way that i think dd can still be alive is the whole nonverbal spell thing. what if snape said avada kedavra but nonverbaly blocked the spell.
ok next theory
snape had to kill dumbledore because of the unbreakable vow he made with dracos mother. but that is only and i mean only if dracos instructions were to kill dd( which i dont really buy ) i personally think that dracos instructions were to find some way for the other deatheaters to get into the school (which he did ) so the other more experienced de's could finish the job. we have to rememeber here that voldemort doesnt like to rely on people he doesnt think they are dependable, so why would he put all this responsibility one one person. especialy a underaged wizard whos father couldnt even do something (prophesy). i think that voldy wanted draco to fail to pay for his fathers mistakes
karsh05
I know i love and love to beleve that dd is still alive (trust me, my email is dumbledore_mourner@*******.com!!) but i have come to the recognition that dumbledore, along with sirius, cedric, and everyone else, is truly dead, and no longer walking the earth in human form, and will never again, for there is
QUOTE
no magic which can bring back the dead
. and all these people are saying these theories that hes not really dead and such, but (and i dont mean to put you guys down or anything) but how likely are any of these things? i just think that what happened, happened, just as it seems. sad.gif
DumbyRocks
I personally think that all evidence points to the death being planned. whether or not Dd is alive or not is something that JR probably wanted us to think about before the next book comes out. I believe and want to believe that Dd is still alive,i mean i think he's an animagus, but that's for a different thread, but at the same time, it would be cheesy and unexpected if Dd turned to be alive. i think JR, if she cares more about the story line, then she would bring Dd back, but if she want to impress her readers, she would keep Dd dead. like i knew long before the 6th book that Dd had to die so when he actually died i actually thought "was is the best she can do?" i think the story would be a lot more interesting if Dd was back and all the questions about his trust in snape would be answered. but then again im in love with Dd so it's just my opinion.
Snape, i loved this character from the first book, and ever since i found out he wasn't suppose to be bad, he remained someone i think will ultimately be the hero in the end. killing Dd was probably the hardest thing he ever did or had to do and i think only killed Dd because he hated voldemort more than he liked Dd. i mean who would kill someone just because the person asked him to? that's the only thing that sort of made me doubt snape's loyalty. i think snape wanted to prove his loyalty a little bit too much
Snowdrop
QUOTE (karsh05 @ Jan 22 2006, 05:05 PM)
...but i have come to the recognition that dumbledore, along with sirius, cedric, and everyone else, is truly dead, and no longer walking the earth in human form, and will never again...

I quite agree with you. It is sometimes amusing to read all those theories about a conspiracy concerning Dd and Snape, sometimes the Malfoys as well, or about a plan faking Dd's death... they're awesome, but it would make the story somehow corny... JK's writing style is not like that imho... if she kills someone, he/she is truly dead and that's all... personally I'm looking forward to the solution she is about to give us in the final book, but I would not hope that there are gonna be huge resurrections happy.gif
Padfoot313
I agree with DumbyRocks, I think that is she does bring him back, I would prefer it in animagus form, because coming back to like or planned death would be repitition from wormtail. The animagus is a new and improved Idea. She already has one facked death, two real deaths (important plot ones - Cedric and Sirius), and a final magical death with explained resurrection would be wonderful. I read the death and was immediately angry. I understood the point to make Harry realize he needs to do it alone in the end, but DD was his mentor, harry, I don't think, is no ready. But, hopefully we meet some loopholes and the pause in the air and slowly floating to the ground will hold a great deal of significance.
Urik Burik
I cried through thouse last chapters.
It was just soooooooooooooooooooooo sad. sad.gif
kcorp
Snape is for sure inocent. I do not know what JK will decide what to do next, however here are some facts:

[1]
Dumbeldore argued with Snape on something, this could not have been simple because he was not keeping a hold on his house, if that was the problem, they would not have gone outside the school to discuss it.

[2]
Aveda Kadavra kills you on the spot .. dumbeldor jumped. For me Snape said Aveda Kadavra but meant something else, and so the effect of the jump. Why say it ... please check point 3

[3]
Why freeze Harry? Why not let him run inside hogwarts, certainly Dumbeldore could have freezed malfoy easilly if he wanted smile.gif Dumbeldore wanted a witness, and who better then Harry, He would definitly not close his mouth smile.gif

[4]
Why did Snape escape? Harry was under the cloak. I guess if he could not see Harry, then he must have felt that no one has seen him do it, only his ecomplesis. So why not stay there, with dear malfoy and say that the other death eaters did it wink.gif

[5]
Snape did not wait for a moment to kill Dumbeldore. Fear someone killing Dumbeldore before him, or fearing someone would REALLY kill Dumbeldore.

I may have forgot something here (have a better post on another forum). However I can give you reasons why Snape does not like this plan at all

[1]
Snape is now hated by the Order and by the Minister. He will be searched by everyone. Would you enjoy that?

[2]
Voldemort anger. Snape does not know how voldemort will take it. Voldemort wants a spy in hogwarts, If Hogwarts remains open Snape is dead, otherwise Snape is ok. Magologan seemed quite to keen on closing Hogwarts!

And why would Dumbeldore want such a thing to happen?

[1]
The Ministry is a hell on earth, they are asking to many questions, they are going to make Voldemort know that Dumbeldore is working on something about his souls which would make Voldemort take some precotions, something which he seems he still did not do ... mmmm, but isn't Snape the eveil guy, didn't he already broken one soul ... mah ... maybe he tought the dark lord was not intrested.

[2]
IFTS, which means 'Information From The Source'. Voldemort maybe will still continue to trust Snape in the same way, however the other Death Eaters know what he did, they will definitly treat him with more resepect, they will trust him more, tell him more ...

[3]
Lead the way. Snape will not be accpeted in the Order very easilly, unless Dumbeldore displays himself again. So he will leave some clues, maybe even baby feed Harry sometimes on where to go next. How else can Dumbeldore help him. In my opinion Snape will always apear in those places where there is a soul .. naturally stupid Harry will think that Snape is trying to steal them for the dark lord, not that he is waiting for him to take it ... asking himself why does dumbeldore really need this boy!!

As I said I do not know if I forgot something .. however answer those questions and if you do then I could say that Snape is not a hero, but a common betrayer smile.gif

regards,
kcorp






my_erised
DUMBLEDORE IS DEAD IT IS THAT SIMPLE J.K ISNT THAT CORNY TO BRING HIM BACK. THE ONLY WAY THAT HE CAN COME BACKIS MABEY ANIMAGUS FORM. NEVER A PERSON AGAIN
kcorp
QUOTE (my_erised @ Feb 2 2006, 07:12 AM)
SIMPLE J.K ISNT THAT CORNY TO BRING HIM BACK.

What if he never went anywhere wink.gif

There is nothing corny in Dumbeldore still being alive because he is more inteligent then the others smile.gif

regards,
kcorp
Helena_723
I cried when Dumbledore died. Who's going to protect Harry now from Voldemort. Dumbledore was the only thing that stood betweed Harry and Voldemort. It just made the book feel even more morbid than it already was.
passerby
Though I have lots to say on this subject, I'll wait until I've read through the most recent thread, as it is I've only ready the last couple of pages. I want to point out something early on in the chapter "Spinner's End" that Snape says regarding the plan (killing Dumbledore).

QUOTE (JKR HBP p. 34)
He intends me to do it in the end, I think.

We all assume he's talking about Voldemort here, but what if . . .he's referring to Dumbledore? There is no qualifier here that refers back to Voldemort (even within the rest of that paragraph). It's just something to think about in regards to what Dumbledore may have planned . . . I think there are plenty of indicators that show us that Dumbledore anticipated his incapacitation, but I'll hold off on anything else for the time being! biggrin.gif
audioslave_9
I have read many of the posts hear so forgive me if I'm repeating something 50 million others have said.

I believe Snape killed Dd because he was told to, thats what they were arguing about. When Harry was having his lesson with DD and he tells him about what he heard Snape telling Malfoy about the Unbreakable Vow, DD says he understands the situation much better than Harry. If he didn't tell Snape to do whatever it takes to prove that he was trstworthy to the other death eaters, than he would of been surprised to hear about this and spoke to Snape about it right away. Also, (correct me if I'm wrong) but the avada kedavra curse can only be used if you really want to kill someone, you don't need to hate them. Snape would of wanted to kill DD because he knew it was the right thing to do, not because he hated him. Snape told Bellatrix that he could never fool VM because he always knows when someone is lying, but people seem to underestimate Snape way to much, he is extremely powerful. He was a better Potion maker than Slughorn when he was only a teenager and he's the only wizard thats blocked Harry's spells (and he did it so easily), none of the other Death Eaters ever got close when they fought in OOTP. There is just to much evidence to prove that Snape is still good and very little evidence against him.

Also, to whoever says DD is still alive, keep in mind that after Snape performed the curse, the curse on Harry was lifted which can only mean that DD was really killed.
freezing
QUOTE (kcorp @ Feb 1 2006, 09:35 PM)
Snape is for sure inocent.

totally agree with that! Not so much because I love Snape's character, but because I really think there's a before-fixed agrrment between Dumbledore and Snape on the subject.
QUOTE
[2]
Aveda Kadavra kills you on the spot .. dumbeldor jumped.  For me Snape said Aveda Kadavra but meant something else, and so the effect of the jump. Why say it ... please check point 3

Do you mean Snape performed a not-spoken spell?

I think Dumbledore jumped because he was right to the edge of the tower borders.
Cedric jumped too, well maybe a little, but he did jumped backward, just the lenght of a step before crushing on the earth, dead.
This could mean that Snape really performed the Killing Course, and if there were maybe in the Hogwarts grounds, Dumbledore wouldn't have jumped, but only crushed.

But I still believe that Snape killed him because there was no other way to save Harry in first place and to mantain a kind of credibility on his side.
If he hadn't killed Dumbledore, he would have died owing to the Unbreakable Vow, pointing the fact that Draco failed on his purpose.
Secondly..If Snape wouldn't have killed Dumbledore, certainly another death Eater would have done it, so at that point Snape would had been suited as a traitor of Voldemort and probably would have been killed in that precise moment.

Now, Snape has all the time and freedom to organize som anti-voldemort action from the inside and that lead me to the horrible thought that in book 7, Rowling might choose to kill him.
In a way that would be grateful, cause he will die as a kind of hero..but it is just an idea..
hp6
he guys i just found something
In hbp, on i believe 195 there is trewalney just talking, well if you look at it carefully you can make it into the events that happen at the tower...
what do you think?
freezing
Can't find it! huh.gif
Page 193 is still the Gaunt chapter in my edition..
Found it! Ok, page 185..I'm reporting the quote from Trelwaney:

QUOTE
Two of spades: conflict, ' she murmured, as she passed the place Harry crouched, hidden. 'Seven of spades: an ill omen. Ten of spades: violence. Knave of spades: a dark young man, possibly troubled, one who dislikes the questioner-'
She stopped dead, right on the other side of Harry's statue.
'Well, that can't be right,' she said, annoyed, and Harry heard her reshuffling vigorously as she set her off again, leaving nothing but a whiff of cooking sherry behind her.

Is this piece that you were talking about?

Definitely the dark young man is Harry. According to Trewlaney he's always been troubled, isn't he? And he also totally dislikes Trelwaney.
The ill omen could possibly mean...well Trelawney has never been in a happy-omen mood, and of course there will be violence at the tower fight.
She stopped cause she thinks it's impossible that someone can dislike her laugh.gif A little bit too self-confident, I must say.
DumbyRocks
QUOTE (audioslave_9 @ Feb 19 2006, 11:00 PM)


Also, to whoever says DD is still alive, keep in mind that after Snape performed the curse, the curse on Harry was lifted which can only mean that DD was really killed.

I don't think Dd has to be dead in order for the spell to be lifted. he could have simply lifted it him self if he was alive.
EvansChild13
There is no doubt in my mind that snape did not betray DD. One thing DD has always done for Harry is drop incredibly subtle almost subliminal hints in all of the books that will help in his journey somehow. I dont think its a coincidence that DD's hand is withering away and that he renames Buckbeak Witherwings...furthermore, he renames him on the same night (or around the time) he "hurts his hand." I think that DD is for sure an animagus and that he is preparing for his death as fawkes does. , by withering away, and this is his way of dropping that hint
Quality Quidditch Supplies
Seeing as how we've reached another 20++ pages, I'm archiving this. Ya'll will have a brand-spankin' new one up faster than you can say 'Quidditch' wink.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.