Another visual change for the boards!
Just three things:
1.) Thanks for all of the responses to my long-winded post. (It's not an essay!

) I'm glad to see this thread is still going.
2.) Ginny 1991 - thanks for the compliment. I wasn't trying to assert however, that Ginny was sans personality. (In her characterisation thread I have repeatedly asserted that Ginny does have a personality in HBP, but that it is one that is thinly sketched, and unpleasant, and that I consequently fail to warm to.)
My criticism in this thread is in part about Ginny's
characterisation rather than her 'personality'. Character is a fictional function that incorporates 'role' and personality. 'Role' is distinct from 'personality', which, is a collection of identifiable traits that are consistently portrayed by a specific character. Ginny's character - i.e. the way in which the author constructs Ginny, portrays her personality and positions her in the text - fails to convince me as a reader about the plausibility of her construction, which in turn elicits the scepticism with which I view
H/G. (If I doubt the solidity of one the characters in this relationship, then unsurprisingly, the ship in turn is rendered problematic, no?)
Yes, action can reveal character. Journey, process and interiority however, (the latter of which denotes the emotional inner life and struggles of a character) are also a vital part of character construction, and the areas in which Ginny is severely lacking.
It would not be difficult to create a list of all of the things that Ginny
does that may provide some insight into her character (i.e. her role in the book)
and her personality (i.e. what she is like as a person). It is far more difficult however, to make an acount of Ginny's growth, or to access her interior life - we know little about Ginny's own thoughts, ideas, hopes, dreams, desires or ambitions etc. that are not in some way linked to Harry, and as I've said many times before, it seems to me as if neither JK (nor Harry) seems to think that Ginny is interesting enough to actually be contemplated within her own right.
Ginny's (Harry-centric) actions are accessible to reader. What is less accessible however is what Ginny thinks or feels of her own accord,
unrelated to Harry. She lacks a seperate, individualised interiority, that other characters are furnished with despite the fact that Harry serves as the narrative lens throughout the series. We are also aware that Ginny changes, but we are not privy to that process. In other words we don't see, and therefore we do not know how she changes (though we can make a good guess as to why.

)
If I attempt to make an account of Ginny's interiority, this is what I see:
We know that she has a crush on Harry Potter and is star-struck and bashful in
Harry Potter's presence; Ginny is also very concious of being the youngest Weasley who is under Molly's stifling jurisdiction. She longs to attend Hogwarts like her brothers before her. She also resents being 'mollycoddled' by Molly and protests viciferously against it. We learn something about Ginny in her own right.
She wants to be her own person, and is desirous of freedom.
Unfortunately, this important aspect of her character is eventually tied to and subordinated by the spectre of Harry, when we come to realise in later books that her various bids for independence from Molly are largely related to being old enough to be among
Harry's peers and in the line of his vision. Later, she (understandably) objects to Ron's controlling behaviour and defends her right to date other boys. But again, this display of 'independence' is revealed to strategically support her aim
to be noticed by Harry.So much for inner growth...
When Ginny is finally of age to attend Hogwarts she feistily defends
Harry Potter from Draco Malfoy. She also writes a childish Valentine to
Harry Potter, yet is pained by her poverty because she believes that it pushes her ouside the scope of (the great)
Harry Potter's attention or liking (Riddle's diary); in TGoF she wants to go the ball with
Harry Potter and is crushed when she can't; in Book Five she develops a sudden and convenient interest in Quidditch which just happens to coincide with
Harry Potter's own love for the sport. As
Ginny 1991 noted, with Fred and George's assistance she concocts a daring plan to contact Sirius in order to asisst (and impress)
Harry Potter. She alleviates
Harry Potter's fears about being possessed by Voldemort, and admonishes then accompanies
Harry Potter to the DoM without fear or question. Amid all of this, Ginny is dating other boys and we are informed that this is an outward manifestation of Ginny's newfound maturity and inner growth. She is apparently
"over Harry". (Note how even in this instance, Ginny's supposed maturity is indelibly
related to Harry Potter rather than occuring as an independent event. She is mature, not because of anything that she does or says in her own right that might indicate this, but
because she is no longer fixating on Harry.)
In Book 6 Ginny feistily defends
Harry Potter - this time from a sneering Blaise Zabini. She performs hexes against someone who is prying about the Deparment of Mystery debacle, which was led by
Harry Potter. She is arguably protecting
Harry's right to privacy as much as her own in this instance. In Book 5 she befriends Luna Lovegood. In Book 6, she defends Luna Lovegood, an act which caused many readers to establish a connection between her and
Harry Potter's mother, Lily Evans; it also mirrors Harry's own sympathy and indignation over Luna in Book 5.
Her relationship with Dean incites
Harry's jealousy and interest. She makes
Harry laugh (by victimising Fleur, Ron, and Zacharias Smith
in front of Harry), she supports him, defends him, comforts him and so on. We also discover that we were misled in Book 5, and that *surprise* Ginny has been carrying a torch for
Harry all along.
Harry Potter, Harry Potter, Harry Potter - *sighs*
Ginny Weasley is all about Harry, to such an extent that one has to wonder if there is anything leftover for Ginny, and as Allie succintly queries in 'Ginny's characterisation thread' "Where is Ginny? Just Ginny?" What about her? Who or what is she, without Harry Potter? Does she have a sense of self that isn't intricately tied to Harry? JK even states in an interview that Ginny was 'made' for Harry and has (apparently) become 'worthy'. Worthy of what exactly? Of being a prominent and interesting character? Of being an associate of the trio? Of being part of a drive to defeat Voldemort? Of being seen as a powerful witch and a force to be reckoned with? Of being more than just a member of the Weasley clan? Of performing heroic deeds in her own right? No.
Ginny, we are informed is 'worthy' of Harry Potter. That's it. That's the journey. At this stage, Ginny's 'journey' hasn't involved evolving into a stronger, independent or more interesting character, or a more powerful or accomplished witch; nor was it one that consisted of Ginny becoming more relevant and important to the central plot; her journey consists of arriving at a point where she can function as Harry's idealised love interest. Getting Harry
is the entirety of Ginny.
This is mirrored in a text that does not seem to have seen fit to portray Ginny as anything other than Harry's hidden, but idealised girl, a perfect platter of wish-fulfilment. Or in other words, Harry's rib. (A point which I have fruitlessly argued in the 'characterisation' thread until the point of hoarseness.)
Ginny 1991 has pointed a few of the ways in which Ginny is conveniently perfect
for Harry, but what about the other side of the equation?
QUOTE(Ginny 1991 wrote@May 2 2006 @ 07:21 PM)
Maybe Ginny is just perfect for Harry because this is the time when he needs someone who is perfect for him.
What about
Ginny? What does Harry fulfil or do
for Ginny? The fact that very few H/G shippers pause to consider this, supports my argument that this is an imbalanced ship that is heavily skewed in order to (superfluously) fulfil Harry's wants, needs and (escapist) fantasies with little consideration for the needs of Ginny Weasley as a character or person in her own right. Hence my comment that (while Ginny has personality) she is not a true character, but 'half a ship' or plot device that serves Harry's
current desires. To touch on
DW's query, once Harry's situation changes and his needs and wants alter as they invariably will, where will that leave Ginny?
And what kind of relationship are we dealing with here, when only the needs of one party come into consideration? For a romance to be believable, and healthy, it is important for readers to see two people who are constructed as seperate characters within their own right (complete with independent identities, desires, and goals which may or may not be held in common) negotiate a way in which they can work together and be together. There is no process of obstacles to be overcome, clashes to resolved, or mismatches to be negotiated with H/G however, because Ginny is authorially fashioned to neatly fit into Harry's life which negates the need for struggle, compromise, or journey. Simply moulding and trimming Ginny to 'fit' Harry is not interesting in the slightest, but reeks of contrivance. No wonder these two never have so much as a genuine disagreement, or negotiate anything. How could they when Ginny for all of her surfac fire is merely the answering reflection of his dreams?
The problem with the whole 'Adam and Eve' scenario is that it puts Ginny/Eve at the disadvantage of being inherently subordinate to Adam/Harry. After all, she is 'made' for him and has no other purpose.
Romance is a genre that is reliant on process, the most interesting of which is when two people who are not 'made for each other' come to a particular understanding. Once again, I'll draw on the example of Will/Lyra of His Dark Materials to illustrate a point. They are compatible in many respects, and are suited to one another, but never once is this suitability flawless or a mere plot device. If Lyra was designed to be 'perfect' for Will for example, then why should readers be interested in a pre-determined, static and foregone conclusion?
Unsurprisingly, some people find this problematic not only for Ginny's characterisation, but in terms of a believavle relationship
between Ginny and Harry that goes beyond being temporary. If she is ideal for a particular place and time, and a specific point in Harry's life, what is to say she won't be locked in that particular place and point in time, as Harry moves on?
While Harry is the central focus of the text, and other characters have varying degrees of relationship with Harry, none of them exist
solely and narrowly in relation to Harry, in the manner that Ginny Weasley has thus far in the series. They have problems, concerns, desires, and ambitions that extend beyond Harry. Malfoy, Zabini, Nott, Luna, Neville, and even Ron and Hermione have lives beyond Harry.
3.) To definitively answer DW's question regarding an H/G reconciliation? I sincerely hope not, and I also agree that too many people overlook JK's plan to bring them together - and then seperate them. I also concur with Elizabeth Bennet's post. That is exactly how I regard H/G - a ridiculous ride from reality that has mercifully come to an end. JK hasn't revealed anything that is not obvious to the reader though. H/G do come together and then part. Beyond than however, it is hard to say. I have no idea what JK will do, though her enthusiasm for H/G seems genuine enough. What I will argue however, is that she has given me very little evidence to suppose that this relationship is more than just a hormonal, adolescent phase with Harry or that it has the potential to be an enduring relationship. So the tenure of the relationship (a few weeks, with very little insight into the inner workings of it) along with the 'split' seems to be appropriate to me, given how little basis we have for rooting for or investing in it.
Book 7 will reveal all though.