Joe Shmoe I thought that at too at first. But the time turner sequence happens after the winter (hogsmeade trip etc.) so it would be in spring. I know, I know, Hogwarts is magical ... but it bugs me whenever I see it Thats what happens when you watch it more than any one person should be allowed

[COLOR=blue]
If you go onto some of the bigger sites, like mugglenet or Warner Bros (or snitchseeker.com) then you can find a huge list of over 200 mistakes. I can't remeber all of them, but here a few.

In the scene where Snape is the sub for Lupin, Hermione's hair switches between being up and down. Her hair style keeps changing.

When Snape finds the mauraders map on Harry, the ties on Harry's sweatshirt are first tied, then dangling down, then tied agian, and so on. It happens againg in the room with Lupin

When Hermione first says "I thought I saw....never mind." Her voice was a lot higher than the second (time-turner) time.

When Hagrid skips the stones, there aren't any ripples from the stones, only him.

In the beginning, you can see the strip on Harry's bed that was used to create the "Lumos" light.

The second time Hermione hit Malfoy (Whoohoo!) She hits him differently and turns away differently.

(Supposedly) When Hermione jumps over the Whomping Willow's branch. you can see the harness on her hip.

When they go down to see Buckbeak the 1st time, it rains for about 2 minutes, then stops. The second time it keeps on raining for a while. (But they couldn't help the weather conditions.)

On the Knight Bus, Harry's sweatshirt is wet after he falls over, but then it's "magically" dry!
That's all I remeber for now.
hope it helps

A lot of people are talking abot time mistakes. they say that its 12 o'clock, and then we they turn back in time its 7:30.
they say that that's a mistake, cos dumbledore is talking about 'three times should do it'
And from 12 till 7:30 is 4,5 hour.
but what if 1 time is 1,5 hour??
then 3 times is 4,5 hour, so that is right then.. what do you think?

Haha speaking of the clock ... Isn't it suppose to ring only on hours not half an hour?

You can find many mistakes at MovieMistakes.

im sorry if somebody already pointed this out but:
When harry and hermione go back in time in the film, they hide behind the stone wall and watch malfoy and his freinds run away after hermione punched him,if you look carefully you could see emma's microphone pack attached to her jeans under her shirt
any body catch that?

people who have been counting (and good counting) counted 234 mistakes. so keep counting, I found 31 hahaha

IN the first film, when the trio s back at the common room after they had they detention(well, in the book, hermione doesn't get one, because she wasn't out of bed that night when they sent Norbert away with Ron's brother, Charlie), they all speak about the meeting with Voldemort in the forest. But hermione then said: "who has Voldemort always feard?"
Hermione never say "Voldemort" before in book five. So why did the director
writ theis in the script. All wizard's and Wiche's fear the name, they wont dear speking it.

Easy........ Because this is a film, Were things are not the same

Yeah. Oliver pretty much got it. Don't ever compare the books to the movies. It always leads to something confusing.

I haven`t noticed any mistakes. There are some things that are not exactly the same as in the book, but that isn`t a mistake - the director just wanted to make the movie understandable even for people that haven`t read the book.

Hey now, do you really think that's a suitable comment to make in a PG forum? Not to mention that there's nothing in the books about it anyway. HP isn't a smut-fest you know.

And please don't post advertising links in your posts unless they are relevant to the topic. Check the rules.

BTW..I should note that Mazen has edited his post since I made mine, which now kind of looks ridiculous.

Not a happy bunny, Mazen. Did you really think I wouldn't notice?

i have caught alot of mistakes here they are:

going to hogsmead in the snow in the book they went in the mud.

i did not hear about the jamakin head in the book

tom was not a retard

he got the firebolt at christmas not at the end

at the en they were under the invisibility cloak

they ran away fom the warewolf, harry did not run at it.


there are alot of mistakes but i will stop here.



swirlctw

Harmaiani v parvia film e otvrat beeeeee
I vav vtoria e otvrat beeeee
I vav tretia e otvrat beeeeee
Vlastelina e super

because the scene probably played out better by saying Voldemort
or
the actors had jsut spent all day doing scenes that envolve saying Voldemort and just continued to when filming later that day and nobody realised.

hm you mabe right, but it just iritating me because Voldemort is a name that almost every wich and wizards fears and dear not say. Voldemort doesn't seem so terrifying if eberyone speaks about him as a day-today activity.Voldemort is a highest unusual subject to speak about in the wizarding world. Understanding me?

Yes, there were A LOT of mistakes:
* Hermione is suppose to have puffy bushy hair, not sleek curls
* Hermione was suppose to SLAP Malfoy
* Hermione was suppose to SLAP Malfoy because he called Hagrid "pathetic" because that was part of the problem
* Hermione is suppose to be in preppy clothes
* When Malfoy got slapped/punched, he was suppose to take it as a man and kinda groan "Cmon" in a mad way.
* Draco was suppose to have sleek gelled back hair (his hair in PoA was kinda cute though)

Of all the mistakes that bug the monkeys out of me, the very first scene of the film has got to be the worst.

Why is Harry doing magic outside of Hogwarts?? You get arrested within a couple of hours for any spells. Why is he casting a wake the Dursleys up spell?

Yes, but that wasn’t predetermined magic that was done on purpose by Harry. And with no one to tell him off, he wasn’t to know that wishing for his cousin to end up inside the snake tank was a bad thing.

I see no difference between casting a protection spell and casting a bright light spell. Both are noticeable by the muggles.

yeah, and the moment in the 5th book when hermione says voldemort for the first time, it was a very sepcila moment.. and now its ruined

I am sorry but I hated her hair.
yak!

I like what you are saying "luna", it is true all witchs and wizards fears and dare not say his name. However if someone point that out to the director or even J.K.Rowling, i think they will see the big mistake and just ignore. Good on yeah to notice it, i have to admit it i didn't . or the director or script writer wanted it, oh no but it is a mistake and I didn't like the fact that Hermione said the name, but it happened and there is nothing anyone can do about it now.

MOD EDIT : The usage of netspeak is not allowed in the forums. Also, please refrain from spelling words in short-form, it makes it difficult for other members to read and understand your posts. Your post has been edited.

the fear of the name increases te fear of thing itself
-Hermione Granger -

copied from DD

you should be afraid for frea itself

according to Lupin.

anyway i am afraid for louds of pain
doesn't maater caused by voldemort or not

*cue for mod to intervene*

You guys are slowly but surely steering off-topic. Please keep posts in here related to Hermione in PS/SS.

The only mistake I usually see is how the vase is different the second time around.

Why do people keep pointing out book-to-movie changes as mistakes?

This is arguable. Shouldn't the head shot have been taken shortly after he was arrested? I mean, they're not about to take photos of him halfway through his prison sentence... Sirius couldn't have looked like a bearded, long haired, aged loony man when he was arrested - he was supposed to be handsome, young (early 20s!) etc.

I don't know, like I said - it's arguable. What do you guys think?

yeah, a lot of films tend to do that. It because they don't want people getting confused with character recognition (not that anyone would mistake Gary Oldman).


not that it's a partcular movie mistake as such;
I have noticed more and more that the Hermione double's hair is straighter than Emma's in the scenes, it's quite easy to tell when it's Emma and when it's not.

Didnt Hermoine grow up in a family of muggles, so she would, like Harry not be affraid of saying his name, once she went to school she found out about voldemort just like Harry, and he doesnt fear his name so why should she, voldemort did absolutely nthing to her, so why should she fear his name.

-Sarah

the only part i didn't like is that the quidditch was done wrong...there was only 1...it was supposed to be 3

Hello... I was just wondering, did anyone notice how in the first movie there was a girl on the Slytherin Team.

In the books does it not say the Slytherin Team is an all male Quidditch team? Just Wondering

That's certainly not a mistake.

Okay that's veering off-topic. This thread is for discussing Hermione in the first film.

If you'd like to discuss the first film in general (what you thought of it) you can do so in this thread here. Or if you'd like to discuss comparing the movie vs the book click here.

I never noticed. I am about to go to the site. I am interested in the mod job though.

Two small mistakes that I noticed were: when harry comes into the room at the leaky cauldren ( the one where he meets fugde) Tom says: You've got a right smart bird there mr. potter, he arived just a few moments before yourself.

Hegwig, of coarse, is a girl.

Another was when Harry and Hermione were trying to get buckbeak out of the pumkin patch, Dumbledore, fudge and the others come walking out of Hagrid's house and Dumbledore starts talking to Fudge and pointing to things, he says: You see those strawberries there? Profeser Dippet had those planted when he was headmaster.

Again it's a simple gender problem, Dippet was Headmistress before Dumbledore became Headmaster.

yeah and at some times harrys eyes werent even green..they were blue! lol it might have been because of the lighting but they were clearly blue to me

Yeah I noticed that too, but I think it was just the lighting.

The mistake I only see is Dudley's hair. This mistake is not only for PoA but for the rest of the movies. I can't stand it, to see Dudley's hair's black while I'm reading the word blond in the book. :sigh:

Yeah, saying Voldermort's name in the first movie is a mistake. I agree that because it's a movie but still, it's a sort of basic thing. No one else aside from Harry and Dumbledore could speak his name.

the books and movies are different. there somehow mistakes and we should not expect that there should be no mistakes in the films.
mistakes are parts of films right?
but a scriptwriter should be very keen of that so that fans like us would not question!

MOD EDIT : Please make sure that when you are posting you make SOME reference to the topic of the thread, otherwise your post will be considered off-topic.

Mabey I'm just being a little too picky but if ya wanted to know there's already a mistake in the Goblet of Fire movie. Look at pictures of harry and Pavarti at the Yule Ball, Pavarti is in the wrong color of dress (and her hair is wrong too .) pg 412 of GOF says "She (Pavarti) looked very preety indeed, in robes of shocking pink, with her long dark plait braided with gold and gold breacelets glimmereing at her rists." Parvarti's dress is more like an orange but I noticed that thought you might want to know!

Yeah..I also noticed that Hermione's dress was the wrong color. It said in the book that it was a pretty periwinkle material, but in the movie preview her dress was light pink...And there's a big difference between periwinkle (being a sort of grayish blue) and light pink...

Oh! I'm glad I wasn;t the only one who noticed that too. I looked at it again and it kindof looked purple

MOD EDIT: Please do not use netspeak in the forums (that's "too," not "2"). Your post has been edited.

Ehh... I think this really depends on how you're defining a 'mistake' in the movie. All of the backstory about the Marauders was eliminated from the 'Prisoner of Azkaban' movie -- do you consider that a mistake or a conscious directorial decision? In my opinion, things like the color of Hermione's dress are not mistakes, but simply differences between the book and the movie. A true mistake is something that was wrong in terms of the filming, for example, Hermione's hair style keeps changing in the scene where Snape is subbing for Lupin's class, or a continuity error -- there are a bunch of those in the Time-Turner sequence. Now, I'm as picky about the books being the same as the movies as anybody, but I still think we have to reserve judgment with regard to mistakes in the movie until we actually see the movie. And we'll call Hermione's dress 'creative license.'

I really don't think that the color of Parvati's dress not being shockpink is a mistake. It's probably going to be wonderfull and as Anthony said "it's the difference between the books and the moovies" so it really doesn't matter, does it? I think it will fit perfect to the rest of the yuleball sceen and if it looks good it's good, right?
I know the book said it was shoking pink but would you really consider that a mistake? I think that they know the color actually was pink in the book but it fitted better with that color in that sceen. I'm sure the diretor's have their reason to why they chose a different color, aight?

like lulu said i don't think the colour of her dress count as a mistake. Big deal! it's just a colour. Now i can get picky like any other harry potter fan, but it's just a colour. now if it was something that was a major thing that deals with the plot then i would count that as a HUGE mistake....