razzberry2
Jan 26 2006, 08:35 AM
I read in a magazine (New Weekly or Womans Weekly, I think - I was in a waiting room

) an editorial which talked about Jk and her feelings on Harry Potter.
It insinuated that the reason Harry was quote - "less likeable" in HBP is because Jk is not comfortable with her current level of fame and she maybe feels some resentment towards the character now as it has brought her so much unwanted fame.
True or not?
Louise
Jan 26 2006, 10:13 AM
Ooh...Razz Gets Controversial...

Only kidding, mate...

Interesting question...I don't know. I haven't read that article, but I did read JKR's interview in Tatler this month and she didn't seem to make any such implications in there. It was more an interview about her as a person though, in fairness, and there was only a very tiny piece about the HP books and Matthew posted that up on the news section of the main site.
Having said that, I do remember her saying somewhere that she would be glad to have this series off her back, so to speak, and I suppose that no one can really blame her for that. She must be tired of writing about basically the same thing all the time and I guess that when she's always had the end pretty much set in stone right from the beginning, she set up her own obstacles because she has a very clear direction in which she wants to head and it must seem as though it's taking forever to get there. Obviously, the money she's making in the meantime is nice, but she does strike me as the type of person who is very uncomfortable with the fame that it brings, which is why she's so private. I remember, a very long time ago, before she got married again I think, that she threatened to sue Hello or OK or one of those types of mags for publishing photos of her daughter and her on holiday, so even before she was quite as huge as she is now, privacy has been a very big thing to her. The more famous you are, the harder that is to protect so if she is tired of anything, I suspect that it's more to do with that than a "hatred" of Harry.
Though I have to concur that I found Harry *much* less likeable in HBP - he seemed arrogant, sometimes rude...at least in OotP his anger was understandable and justified. I suppose it could have been in HBP too, had JKR chosen to make more of his grief for Sirius, but she didn't, making his behaviour rather obscure and groundless, IMHO.
I suppose that perhaps she's finding it slightly stifling from a creative angle now in that she wants to move on and so other things so she just can't wait for it all to be over.
I guess it's nice to be so successful now that she has that level of freedom...a lot of struggling writers out there are just grateful for the money and if their "art" has to suffer a little to fit in with what's "popular" then that's a sacrifice they're willing to make.
Well....there ya go...my little psycho-analysis of JK Rowling
Nice topic, mate
Omerus_Banning
Jan 26 2006, 08:13 PM
Of course, continuing with Louise's psycho-analysis, on could say that she is simply mired in the anger phase of her grief over the series coming to an end in Book 7.
Although I have a hard time with JKR having such harsh feelings about the work which has made her a household name...
Just a thought...
passerby
Jan 27 2006, 06:19 AM
I don't know. . .I think that she's always had 7 in her head, and though she may tire from the day-to-day business of being pressured by the deadlines of being in the publishing world with such an anticipated series . . .I don't get the feeling from the books, or from interviews that I've read, that she's at all tired of Harry.
Having been a teenager myself . . .(once upon a time), I kind of felt that Harry's temperment in HBP was on track with the normal development of the teenage mind. Adding in all that "chosen one" stuff, and it might make for a volatile situation in anyone's book. . . so I wan't bugged by Harry's personality.
All in all, I'm sure she'll be happy to have the series completed so she can get into living her life without pressure from publishers and fans and deadlines and such; but that doesn't mean she still doesn't enjoy Harry as much as she did when she first came up with the concept.
I'd like to read that interview, Razz. . .wish you remembered where it was from.
razzberry2
Jan 27 2006, 04:25 PM
| QUOTE (passerby @ Jan 27 2006, 05:26 PM) |
I'd like to read that interview, Razz. . .wish you remembered where it was from. |
Actually it wasn't an interview, it was more an editorial on Jk and I thought it was quite obviously biased to the point of view of the writer, which as I said "implied" that the possible reason for the change in Harry's character in HBP was because she didn't like Harry anymore.
As Louise pointed out, Jk is a very private person, which I can identify with, and the inferrence was that she loathed all the attention she gets from certain parts of the media so much that its turned her against Harry.
The article was definitely in either Womans Weekly or New Weekly, Australian edition, though I don't know what month, though obviously, it was sometime after HBP.
I haven't actually expressed an opinion on the matter as of yet, merely posting an overview of the story because I thought it was an interesting take on things.
The article also said that Jk is becoming "too big for her boots" and that she has been said to have demanded so much control over the interviews she does, right down to having final approval of them before they are printed, that some journalists were left thinking that it just wasn't worth all the hassle.
I honestly couldn't tell you whether there was any truth to those statements though.
obsessive hp egs
Jan 27 2006, 08:04 PM
| QUOTE (razzberry2 @ Jan 26 2006, 01:42 AM) |
I read in a magazine (New Weekly or Womans Weekly, I think - I was in a waiting room ) an editorial which talked about Jk and her feelings on Harry Potter.
It insinuated that the reason Harry was quote - "less likeable" in HBP is because Jk is not comfortable with her current level of fame and she maybe feels some resentment towards the character now as it has brought her so much unwanted fame.
True or not? |
i dont think thats true. she always likes in the interveiws she does
passerby
Jan 28 2006, 03:40 AM
I can definately feel for her wanting to maintain a private life. It's a bit different for actors, i think, since they are so much in the public eye that it's very difficult for them to stay private (though it can obviously be done). With authors, though, I don't think anyone has come upon the success and public viewing as JKR. . .I hope that she can stay balanced and as private as she wishes to be.
Thanks, Razz, for the info. I guess most editorials are pretty biased. . .but it's kind of annoying when they try to alter other people's views on a person or thing without any basis.
Louise
Jan 28 2006, 12:27 PM
| QUOTE |
| The article also said that Jk is becoming "too big for her boots" and that she has been said to have demanded so much control over the interviews she does, right down to having final approval of them before they are printed, that some journalists were left thinking that it just wasn't worth all the hassle. |
Ah....well, that explains it.
Nothing but a big case of sour grapes, mate

Sounds to me as if some journalist tried to get an interview with her, was refused (because JKR likes her privacy and there's nothing wrong with that...she is a human being after all) and now is publishing a biased personal attack because they've been given the brush off.
No doubt there is probably a *grain* of truth in it...JKR does control a lot of her publicity, but then that's probably because she's been kicked in the teeth a few times so I guess that makes you a bit more cautious.
All the same, I do wish she had chosen the people who did her post-HBP interview (you know...THE interview...

) a bit more carefully but anywho...that's all water under the bridge now.
razzberry2
Jan 28 2006, 12:59 PM
When I read it I did register a bit of 'tall-poppy-bashing' syndrome going on, but the real part of the article that interested me was the idea that a writer, (in this instance Jk) could actually turn against their characters and make them less appealing (whether consciously or not) because of the unwanted attention they recieved when their characters become so popular.
I'm not that well versed in literary world, so I don't know how often Jk's sort of success happens, but it seems to me that Jk is in a fairly unique situation. So maybe something like this could happen?
As far as the control she has over her interviews, it is probably more to do with being stung (as Louise says) and also trying to keep her private life - private, rather than what the article suggested, being "too big for her boots". That sort of comment implies your dealing with a person who has an over-inflated opinion of themselves, and I can't say I've ever seen that in Jk. Let's face it, she certainly doesn't need to do interviews to get publicity for her books!
Looooony Luna
Jan 29 2006, 11:21 AM
Theres information about this rumour on JK's site under the rumour part. Hang on I'll type in what it says, I think its pretty short:
the title is : Rowling Hates Harry Potter
and all she says to it is : II love Harry Potter and I always will.
In quite a few of the rumours JK goes in to lengthy detail because they have really offended her and she feels the need to defend herself or family (such as 'Neil gives up work') but she doesn't on this one, I feel because she does not feel she needs to justify herself.
I agree that she resents how famous she is and how it imposes on her family and private life but I don't think she would let this interfere with the shaping of Harry's character, after all she has had the basic plot progression of his character planned for ages.
She's probably so controlling in interviews because she has been taken advantage of before and she hates lies being told about her or her family.
I agree passerby and think that the way Harry is in HBP is just realistic to how a teenager should be, especially one that has gone thoruhg so much and is finally realising the true weight he has on his shoulders.
*weasley*
Jan 29 2006, 12:18 PM
but why would she be bored about harry potter i mean doesn't she enjoy the fame (i would

)but really who could get annoyed or bored with harry potter i mean this is harry potter were talking about i'd be so excited about it if i wrote the book don't you get what i mean
potter's girl
Jan 29 2006, 03:35 PM
JK isn't tired of Harry Potter! Think about it, if everyone you loved was killed by Voldemort and you alone could destroy him you would also have a bit of a bad attitude too wouldn't you. That is what Rowling is trying to portray in Harry. Also most every teenager is like that. She could never get tired of HP, it's her creation and she still lloves the story like we all do.
Louise
Jan 29 2006, 05:42 PM
| QUOTE (Razz) |
| [...]but the real part of the article that interested me was the idea that a writer, (in this instance Jk) could actually turn against their characters and make them less appealing (whether consciously or not) because of the unwanted attention they recieved when their characters become so popular. |
Mmm, yeah...I see where you're coming from. It is an interesting question isn't it? I don't honestly know. I guess the only thing you can really do is put yourself in her shoes and try to imagine it. If you've ever written a *really* long fanfic with an original character or a completely original work, then you'd have to ask yourself if you could ever envisage a time when you would feel that you had gone as far with the character as you possibly could, would you consider changing that character slightly in order to make them less likeable, hoping that the audience would turn off?
I guess when I put it like that, thinking about it now, it doesn't really seem like something I personally would do, and I can't see JKR doing it either because surely it would be counter productive? She'd have all her fans becoming indifferent, pretty much scuppering any future career she might have because people would be more cautious about reading anything new, knowing that the author has a tendancy to completely reinvent characters when she has grown tired of them.
So no, I don't think that it's really something an author would do. They may get slightly jaded and try something new, but to actually turn on a character...no, probably not. They'd probably just kill them off

Besides, if she really did say that on her site (and I'm sure she did...it's just that if I open more than one window on my compy at the moment, it tends to start having fits

) then I guess that news article definitely is nothing but a load of hot air from a slightly peeved reporter
passerby
Jan 29 2006, 08:47 PM
I can see where that's going as well, but to be honest, I don't think there are a lot of long series out there with the same character. (Of course, I know there are J.D. Robb (nora roberts) and his crime-mystery type novels. . .but I haven't ever read them. I'm thinking more of the "Literature" circuit and not the pop-fiction. With the classic authors, though they've written mutliple books, they are completely different plots and characters, you know? (Except LOTR, and others. I'm just going to have to put my foot in it here, I guess!)I do read Janet Evanovitch's Plum series, which until the last one, was completely entertaining. She's contracted for three or four more . . .or something like that. . .and I'm tired of the character; can't say how Janet's fairing with Stephanie. It's just that the character hasn't really had much personal growth in the series and it's book 11. I don't see that with Harry Potter because there's a definate ending in sight, and there is a definate "journy" Harry is taking, physically and mentally. I guess I would be more likely to say that she's tired of his character if she didn't already have it all mapped out in her head. If each book was an "okay, now what should Harry do?" I'd get tired of that, myself.
Enough of that rambling. . .
Hermione's freak
Jan 30 2006, 12:11 PM
no way, i don't think so!!! you see in OUR country, and in OUR magaizine j.k says that she can't wait to start with the last of harry potter book and she also states that she can't imagine life without harry potter. and j.k is so very very famous, that i'm shocked she could say a thing like that. i like j.k very much and i think she's really famous and kind.
i just can't think how she could've said that hp.hbp was less likable. i loved that book soo much.
Nimbus
Feb 1 2006, 12:02 AM
Hmm, I think that might just be a bunch of bologny. Rowling always seems really eager to write and talk about Harry Potter, when it's convienient to do so, so I don't know why she would suddenly have a resentment towards it. And yeah, I think she addressed this on her site and she debunks it as just a rumour.
As for the psychological aspect of it, as a writer I think Rowling has a very good idea of who Harry is as a character and what king of attitude and person he is so I can't see her unconsciencly changing him. I mean she has lived with him inside her head for around 20 years now, so he's as good as a real person to her and I'm not so sure who he is to her could be subconsciencly altered like that. Just my opinion tho
Agent0042
Feb 1 2006, 05:44 AM
I think all is well with J.K. and Harry Potter right now. She had this to say in her most recent posting in her diary on her official site:
| QUOTE |
JANUARY 25th
Sometimes writing goes so smoothly that you feel as though you are simply taking dictation from your muse. In my case, this often happens after a period where I am unable to write, such as over the Christmas period (compounded this year by the children's colds mentioned in the previous diary entry). It is as though all the ideas that ought to have leaked out in the usual intermittent fashion over the preceding couple of weeks explode out of my pen once I have a few hours in which to work. I am usually most productive when I have, or have recently had, limited time.
Of course, this heavenly state of affairs will not last, it never does. I'm bound to get all snarled up in a plot tangle, or else find myself temporarily stranded on the edge of a large hole in the story. Until then, however, I shall enjoy floating along on this flood of inspiration. |
So she's doing really well right now. And I'm sure she still quite likes Harry.
Nicky_92
Apr 8 2006, 12:27 PM
I don't thinkt this is true, it was probably the magazine making up stuff, because they haven't got anything else to write about. I don't think she would say she is sick of writing the Harry Potter books, because it was these books that have made her so much money. She also said in an interview, (I can't remember which one) that she was going to miss writing Harry Potter after the seventh book has come out. Even though all of these bad things happened in the sixth book, HBP, she probably wrote them to add interest to the story, she can't just write about good things that happen to Harry, otherwise it would get boring. She also planned all of the books out, before she even wrote the first book, PS, so that is also why there area lot of bad things that hapen in HBP, he is also growing up and he is no longer a child.
VividGreen
Apr 9 2006, 12:25 AM
| QUOTE (Looooony Luna @ Jan 29 2006, 11:21 AM) |
Theres information about this rumour on JK's site under the rumour part. Hang on I'll type in what it says, I think its pretty short:
the title is : Rowling Hates Harry Potter and all she says to it is : II love Harry Potter and I always will.
In quite a few of the rumours JK goes in to lengthy detail because they have really offended her and she feels the need to defend herself or family (such as 'Neil gives up work') but she doesn't on this one, I feel because she does not feel she needs to justify herself.
I agree that she resents how famous she is and how it imposes on her family and private life but I don't think she would let this interfere with the shaping of Harry's character, after all she has had the basic plot progression of his character planned for ages.
She's probably so controlling in interviews because she has been taken advantage of before and she hates lies being told about her or her family.
I agree passerby and think that the way Harry is in HBP is just realistic to how a teenager should be, especially one that has gone thoruhg so much and is finally realising the true weight he has on his shoulders. |
I agree with everything that you said. I doubt she'd ever hate something she put so much hard work, and so much of herself into (even if it does annoy her at times which I'm sure it does). I also highly doubt she'd actually let her fame—which she obviously doesn't like—affect Harry's character. I don't mind Harry's character growth at all in HBP or OOTP because I think his behavior is appropriate for a teen of that age who has gone through as much as he has. More than half of the teens I knew in HS were
more emotional, whiney, ****y, arrogant etc, when all they have to worry about is school.

So, even though it can be annoying I think it's understandable, and not just a reflection of her 'now hating Harry'. That's silly.
dungeonguard
Apr 9 2006, 12:39 AM
J.K. Rowling, the imagination behind the Harry Potter part of history, is not getting sick of her masterpiece. Why? Well, there are many reasons why, but the main one is that absolutly no one would put so much of their time, money, and effort into something that they hated. I think that J.K. Rowling loves Harry Potter, and she would probably agree with that. Just because her books are becoming a more long wait, it does not mean that she is just being lazy and not writing them. Instead it means that she is taking her time on the final implyment of the series. Harry Potter does not make me ill, sick, or bored, and neither will it make anyone else. Harry Potter is going down as history in the next few years, and no one is going to say otherwise because in the world of Harry Potter, unexpected things can happen, comedy occurs, tragedy occurs, and most of all, a love from the loyal fans occurs. Harry Potter will live on forever in all of our hearts, and yes; J.K. Rowling definitly feels the same way.
tuni
Jun 1 2006, 03:25 PM
Well friend i don't read this article right now,but i don't think so that JK is sick about Harry Potter series.She should definitely have some problems in her mind if she says like that in the article.
greeneyes
Jun 3 2006, 03:46 PM
Actually, I remember this article which was probably in the New Weekly or New Idea awhile ago. These Australian magazines are actually referred 'rags' and is usually full of false speculations or twisted in some way. I'm guessing that you are thinking, then why did I get it?

Well, I saw on the cover that there was an 'exclusive' interview with JKR (I don't remember what it exactly was) and I got excited and then purchased it. I remember feeling really surprised and dishearted by the comments. Then I realised that it is a typical 'rag' magazine - which every single week, always contradicts itself - so I took it with a grain of salt...Therefore, I agree with you guys perfectly ^^
slytherin_xo
Aug 12 2006, 12:04 AM
it makes sense that she might be bored with harry potter but honestly, she has no right to be. she owes it to her fans to finish the 7 book series with a bang and keep writing great books. and seriously, who woulud ever get sick of being famous? i sure wouldn't!
big_al
Aug 12 2006, 10:13 PM
Everyting coming out of JK Rowling's mouth seems to suggest that she is still enjoying the Harry Potter books. She is happy to answer any questions about Harry and seems to be enjoying the building speculation over the series' future. If she was sick of it, than why would she be off in New York giving book readings?
I can completely understand why she might feel that she needs to move on from Harry Potter. All authors want to be recognised for writing about different and interesting subjects and she dosn't want to be pigeon-holled in for the rest of her caraer.
However, as an author, you have got to be looking forwars to finally completing your creation. She must know that Book 7 will be the most hyped-up and publicised book of our generation, and will be read by millions and millions of kids and adults. You'd of thought that she would be incredibly excited at that thought, not sick to death of it.
Mary Bongiovi
Aug 13 2006, 02:00 PM
I don't think so.
Dumbledore's Widow
Aug 15 2006, 02:04 PM
Even if JKR is fed up with Harry Potter and would rather move on to writing other books (that have nothing to do with HP), she knows that it was HP that brought her fame and lots and lots of fortune!! She would be a fool to state that she hates Harry, or that she is even tired of him. There are just too many fans out there who would crucify her for having said so. I dare say many of the fans like Harry, not so much Rowling! Perhaps this is why she is a bit ticked off. Who knows. Who cares. I for one love Harry - albeit not the one written in book 6! - and don't particularly care for JKR. I have my reasons which I don't think I should go into now. But, that's just me.
Spencer Potter
Aug 15 2006, 06:31 PM
JK Rowling I dont think is sick of Harry Potter. Say, if you made a book and it got popular and you continued on with the series would you be sick of the certain book if it brought you fortunes, I wouldnt think so. Id love the book for what it has done for me, then again.. who wouldn't?
Horace Slughorn
Aug 16 2006, 04:57 AM
I do not think that Rowling would ever become sick of Harry Potter, as long as the fans don't become sick of reading him. Harry Potter is Rowling's creation, and she said she became attached with him. She really enjoys writing the Harry Potter series, but sometimes may take vacation breaks. (Everyone needs a break sometimes!) The series is so popular and such a great story. She loves it and would never in a million years get sick of reading or writing her books.
~_
H-
S_~
Harry_Ginny777
Aug 16 2006, 02:59 PM
well i don't think she is sick of Harry Potter she said this kind of book comes along once in a life time and she is so proud of those books. and she loves Harry Potter she is not sick of them from the beginning she even said there will be 7 books no matter what. so if that is the case why everyone thinks she is sick Harry potter is because this is the last book and she is not going to write more. well she said there is going to be 7 book and she kept that promise there is 7 books and after this i will so proud to be one of those people who read all 7 books that is awesome.
TomRiddle
Sep 6 2006, 08:54 PM
I doubt she hates him just cuz she gets too much attention, she loves to write and we love to read, its not HP fault that everyone loves her now, well it kinda is......aww man i dunno, all i noe is that HP should not be hated by his author and he probably isn't.
Potter_Addict_713
Sep 8 2006, 12:45 AM
No, I don't think JK will ever get sick of Harry. She loves her books, but all good books have to come to a close at some point. And the 7th book is JK's ending to Harry Potter. I think when she says that she will not write anymore books about Harry, saying that you will need no extra information after book 7. I am looking ofrward to and ideal ending!
Ygraine
Sep 8 2006, 01:05 AM
Hi there TomRiddle!

I'm just about to send you an Owl, which you can read by either clicking on the pop up that should appear or on the link on the right hand side that says '1 Owl waiting'
Looknig forward to hearing from you!

Ygraine
FleurDelacour
Nov 19 2006, 03:59 AM
[Mod Edit] None of that. You may disagree but say it nicely or I'll delete your entire post next time.
wicked_witch
Nov 21 2006, 10:33 PM
I can't blame her if she's tired of writing about harry potter, but she can't really dread it now. I bet she'll be happy when she doesn't have to write about Harry's life anymore. My guess is that she'll kill off Harry, for the book's sake.
Dumbledore's Widow
Nov 22 2006, 06:57 PM
QUOTE(wicked_witch @ Nov 21 2006, 05:33 PM) [snapback]263853[/snapback]
I can't blame her if she's tired of writing about harry potter, but she can't really dread it now. I bet she'll be happy when she doesn't have to write about Harry's life anymore. My guess is that she'll kill off Harry, for the book's sake.
JKR may well be tired of all of the HP hoopla. In a sense, she's like some actors, who find themselves type cast. The actor, Tony Dow, who played "Wally" in the old Leave It To Beaver TV series, is an example of an actor who was type cast, and it took him years to shake that image. Anyway, JKR may feel that if she doesn't end the HP series soon, she may never really be as successful with something else. Hate to say this, but, I have this gut-feeling that JKR will never
shine again (as she does with her HP books). So, she may well be sick and tired of Harry Potter. It's funny how people get. She was once on welfare and the HP series made her wealthier than she could ever have imagined. And now she is sickened by the very one who gave her wealth and fame. Funny, isn't it?
Seriouslysirius
Nov 22 2006, 07:31 PM
I doubt she is or will ever be sick of harry Potter because it's a part of her really.
Though she may be getting tired of the stress it may cause. She's probably a bit glad she's reached the finally book.
But she most certainly always like it.
clara morgue
Nov 22 2006, 08:12 PM
i dont think that jkr will ever get tired of hp itself. she created a world and evrything she does is related to that. it must of become less of a job or a book and more of a way of life. she probably feels quite sad that she has come to the end of the books.
but, i do believe that she has already got very tired of all the hyp surrounding harry potter. she has fans in many countries and eveywhere she goes, she is known. people would start to see you as the ' author of that harry potter book' and less of an actual person with your own life and feelings.
the stress that must cause must be very hard to bare.
i know i won't ever get sick of the hp universe and we pray that she doesn't either.
Imperium
Nov 23 2006, 08:15 PM
I don't think she would get so bored that she would stop writing (well, she couldn't now as she's probably nearly finished) but I must get rather arduous sometimes, I mean seven pretty long books (excluding the first three which wern't so long) Is alot to write.
xXTonksXx
Nov 23 2006, 09:48 PM
i dont think she is sick of harry. it must be quite important to her though anyway. its how she got famous and really rich although i understand that she has been writing it for sixteen years although she was the one that said there were going to be seven books so...
magicalfairy
Nov 24 2006, 03:19 AM
I think JK Rowling is relieved that the will finally be finishing up her series as she has pointed out in a previous interview, but I definately do not think that she is tired of her character. She has stated too many times that she loves her character.
Layla
Nov 24 2006, 04:33 AM
I think that Rowling has been with Harry Potter so long that she couldn't hate him. I suppose that when you're with someone that long it's like they are apart of you and they are always there.
Silence Dogood
Nov 24 2006, 05:16 AM
If I was here, I would be getting quite annoyed with writing about the same people for the last decade. It wouldn't surprise me if she wants it to be over, and write about something different.
wonwon*&*hermy
Nov 25 2006, 01:46 AM
I dont think Jk Rowling hates Harry Potter but gets annoyed of writing about them and it not being right so she has to rewrite over and over. She has been writing her story of HP for along time and sometime she probably just feels like being done with it and she will probably be relieved when it is over but she will probably also feel a bit of sadness that her story is over forever too.. . She has mixed feeling about it being almost over probably
Spencer Potter
Nov 25 2006, 06:30 AM
Oh goodness, I hope she doesnt hate it, because if she did what was the point of carrying on? I dont think she hates it but is tired, maybe writers block? I get that lots when Im doing stories for English.. but then again Im not professional!
stag
Nov 27 2006, 02:46 AM
I think that JKR is getting tired of writing about Harry Potter. When I was reading books 1-3, I could feel that the author really loved writing them, you know what I mean? There was an enthusiastic air about the words. Then in books 4-5, I couldn't feel that from her anymore. And when I read book 6, I completely felt that she just wanted to get the books over with, which I can understand since I could never write for so long about 1 topic. And I'm not saying that it didn't come out successfully - no, I loved it. Maybe I'm imagining this, or maybe the books are merely getting more war-based. The books have also started getting smaller. And the seventh is also said to be smaller than the 5th.
**pigwidgeon**
Nov 27 2006, 09:10 AM
I totally disagree with you!!
I think her STYLE of writing has changed, but she still loves them. And if she didn't want to write the seventh book, she doesn't have to. no-one is forcing her to write more, she is choosing to. She is enthusiastic and she is not writing them for the money, she is writing them because she wants to.
stag
Nov 27 2006, 08:39 PM
Maybe she is enthusiastic, I could be wrong.
But what I'm saying isn't that she doesn't want to write it, or that she's doing it for the money, or anything like that, I just think she wants to get it done.
iluvhp
Nov 28 2006, 01:17 AM
Noway!
JKR, is not sick of Harry Potter...I think she loves him and the books and the whole thing. She just has to end the story somewhere. She can't keep us waiting forever. And it is hard work writing a 700 or 800 page book the way she does. I mean i am a little it of an author myself and it's easy ecause the words just come to me but then the way she has one thing leading to the next. It is just so perfect. I am positively sure she is not sick or tired of Harry potter.
dumbledore_girl
Dec 22 2006, 09:20 AM
No, I don`t think so. JKR isn`t sick of Harry Potter.. if she was she didn`t write book 7.. writing is her life and I think that she wouldn`t waste the time writing something that she don`t like and she is sick of. Now all of her activities are happening around Harry Potter .. dunno.. and I don`t think that JKR is affected too much about the things that she is unortodox.. she is a plagiator.. she don`t have ideas and she uses others` ideas. She knows the truth and she nows that she have unlimited fans of any age. We, her fans, must encourage and protect her against those .. crazy people 8-}
HermioneClone
Jan 13 2007, 04:16 PM
I agree with so many of you. I don't think JKR hates Harry or is sick of him at all. Everything I have seen directly from her (like on her site, etc.) is positive and usually enthusiastic about the characters and her writing. She has made an enormous story and I'm sure she gets frustrated when she gets left with a hole in her writing or things aren't coming out right, which is very normal for a writer.