Louise
Feb 12 2006, 11:12 AM
Yup, it's back...in all its former glory!

H/Hr's say that they still have a case, no matter what JKR might say. There's canon evidence pointing towards the possibility of this ship to be found in HBP.
H/G and R/Hr's say that it's just not happening...it's canon and HBP confirms it.
What do you think?
Just one word of caution in addition to the rules laid out in Hogsmeade - this is a potentially nasty one. Don't let it become so. Make it personal, you'll get booted from the Great Hall.
Yes, I'm shouting -
RESPECT ONE ANOTHER IN HERE OR YOU WILL BE EVICTED.You don't want a poking from the Inquisitorial Squad and you
definitely don't want one from a mod - behave yourselves in here.
traz-ak
Feb 16 2006, 07:27 AM
Well, nobody else has jump-started this debate yet, so I guess I'll do it. I'll tell you now: I feel kinda strange doing it, since I'm really not much of a shipper. If I were a shipper, I would've been on the H/G and R/Hr ships (and yes, I can feel the heat from Louise's stare as she looks at me incredulously). That's just the way I always saw it and I just never really got the other point of view. In fact, when I first got my brother to read the books and he told me he didn't know whether he was expecting Harry and Hermione to get together or Ron and Hermione, I was floored just by the idea. On my own, reading the books, I just never saw Harry and Hermione as a couple. Not even a little bit. But Ron and Hermione were just downright obvious, and I naturally assumed Harry and Ginny would eventually get together from the first book (I'm starting to think that it may do wonders for your perception of Ginny if you just start the series out figuring that you'd better end up liking her or else you're gonna hate it when she gets together with Harry... *shrug*).
So anyway, that was just my natural perspective, and I had no idea that there was anyone out there other than my brother who saw Harry and Hermione as a potential couple until just before HBP when I finally got involved in the online HP community. But like I said, I really wasn't much of a shipper. I just assumed things were gonna work out a certain way, but I never got too invested in it. But here's my opportunity to see what all you who were and are on the H/Hr ship saw in those two. And so why I figured I'd go ahead and make the first post here. You H/Hr-er's are out there, so why don't you tell me? You have canon evidence; I want to know about it. Convince me. I really want to hear it!
(Hopefully, that will get the conversation up and running here. If it doesn't, I might have to start saying what a cute couple Harry and Ginny make just to get a reaction out of you!

)
secretkeeper
Feb 17 2006, 02:48 AM
I was a Ginny fan up till a few weeks ago when Razz turned me against her from her fic. I can just see her doing something stupid to ruin her and Harry's relationship so I am on Louise's side of the line but a few feet away from here.

I Haven't really been into the ships because thats not what I think the books should be considered about. The main ones that I saw were the H/G and Hr/R ships and thats about it. (look at my signature and that will tell you how big of a fan I am of the weird ships) I think that some ships are out of control like the McGonagal/DD or Snape/Tonks ect...
As of right now I am a Hr/R shipper. The only reason I chose that side is because they are soo much alike and they get along and have fights like any couple does. I'm not a huge supporter. I won't argue that H/Hr might happen, I just don't think that it will happen right now but like Traz said, I am loose on this subject until someone recruits me to their side.
As of now, I'm standing in the middle of the lines until someone drags me to their side.
Just the Droobles
Feb 17 2006, 03:29 AM
Being an avid shipper, (for some reason I always have been) I would be rather glad to hear from some H/Hr shippers that have some good evidence. I"m not trying to say that it has no evidence--I can completely understand where H/Hr shippers get their view. I just tend to see more between R/Hr.
I actually had a late start on reading the books and I was told about Ron and Hermione before I had ever read about it. I was like "What?!?! Ron and Hermione?!?!" But after it was pointed out to me, I thought the evidence in the books became increasingly more obvious as the books went along. (also feels Louise's stare...) I always thought they were very compatable.
Then I saw what had been brewing about people thinking it would be H/Hr. Honestly, I thought it was perhaps one of the weirdest things I had ever seen, and threw it out the window. Upon hearing arguements though, I understand everything behind the H/Hr ship, but I just can't support it because I support R/Hr. Sorry!
And then H/G hit me. I was like "Aww!" all at first, I loved the books, I thought it was all awesome and stuff. Then I thought on it, and it just got real cheesy. Monster in the stomach? Big smooch scene(I still actually like that one though)? A "It's not you, it's me" breakup? Come ON!! I thought I was reading the Notebook or something. I wish we could get some real moments between Harry and Ginny. As of now, I still support them, I'm just a little skeptical about what's going to happen.
Well, those are my beginning thoughts. Maybe some more people will come in here, and we can have a nice little talk.
Snowdrop
Feb 19 2006, 03:06 PM
Well, I was never much of a shipper, not because I'm not the romantic type but because I was never displeased with any of the ships in HP. I accept JKR's choice, thus I guess I support H/G and R/Hr.
As for H/Hr, I do not think that that will actually happen. I like both of them (although I am sometimes a bit annoyed by Hermione

), as I guess we all do, but imho it would be too trivial if they would come together. I see more phantasy in H/G than bringing the hero of the series together with his best friend (the best friend with other best friend simply sounds better and less common for me).
H/G was a big surprise for me, I would have never thought that, I've always assumed that it is just Ginny's platonic love towards Harry, and was incredibly surprised when reading about the monster in the stomach Just the Droobles mentioned.

However, I really liked that smooching scene and was absolutely impressed by the way they kinda broke up. That was a proof for Harry's emotional matureness, a big sacrifice for both him and Ginny. Anyway, I hope we'll see them in Book 7 somehow together again.
*dementor*
Feb 22 2006, 03:36 PM
well..where do i start...
I am a H/Hr shipper and a R/Hr shipper and a H/G shipper....i am quite used to being a Multi-Shipper and it is very amusing really to see peoples different opinions on ships....
I believe H/Hr could happen, as JKR is always using "unexpected twists" with us and surprising us and i think his would be one of the times it happens!!
Also with R/Hr..isn't it obvious that Ron likes her...i mean he hates it when she says good things about harry and ignores him....and they are just jealous of each other..making fights out of it which makes me laugh at them

I mean hello...you both are not that dum not to realise are you?
And Last but not Least....H/G...

Ginny obviously is on the look out for famous people like Harry because we all have to admit that she liked him in the first book without knowing anything about him except that he was Famous because of this and that...but then she got to know him with luck and they got together but he broke up with her....hmm...all we need to see is if he will get back with her or not!!
Snowdrop
Feb 22 2006, 07:26 PM
You're right on Ginny, but I would add something in order to defend her.

It is true that she was fond of Harry even in the first book, where she did not know anything about him except for his name, but se was approx. 10 at that time. Most people are being silly and in some cases superficial at that age, some even later.
Anyway, since then, Ginny almost grew up, I think this previous behaviour is not a counterargument against H/G.
HaRRYPoTTeR FReaK
Feb 26 2006, 05:19 AM
This is one of my favorite debates, I must say. Let's get the ball rolling, shall we?
Ron and Hermione. They are a lovely pair, aren't they? Ah, they are. But some people don't think so. I believe that JKR has done more than enough to set us up for their relationship. They're perfect for each other, they really are. Of course, there
is canon evidence to support their relationship, as well as a JKR interview. *wink wink*
Remember GoF? Ron waited until the last minute to ask Hermione out to the Yule Ball. Hermione was frustrated because Ron had used her as a last resort, instead of a first pick. Ron was just scared, I think, of rejection. And we all know that his jealousy sprouted when he found out that Hermione was going to the ball with Viktor Krum. Ah ... young love.
There is a JKR interview I found that can back up this theory. It also suggests a little Harry/Ginny. I found it at
Madame Scoop, a really wonderful interview site. Anyway, here it is. Be warned, though, there are HBP spoilers. Here you are!
| QUOTE |
MA: How much fun did you have with the romance in this book?
JKR: Oh, loads. Doesn't it show?
MA: Yes.
JKR: There's a theory - this applies to detective novels, and then Harry, which is not really a detective novel, but it feels like one sometimes – that you should not have romantic intrigue in a detective book. Dorothy L. Sayers, who is queen of the genre said — and then broke her own rule, but said — that there is no place for romance in a detective story except that it can be useful to camouflage other people’s motives. That's true; it is a very useful trick. I've used that on Percy and I’ve used that to a degree on Tonks in this book, as a red herring. But having said that, I disagree inasmuch as mine are very character-driven books, and it’s so important, therefore, that we see these characters fall in love, which is a necessary part of life. How did you feel about the romance?
[Melissa puts her thumbs up and grins widely while…]
ES: We were hi-fiving the whole time.
JKR: [laughs] Yes! Good. I'm so glad.
MA: We were running back and forth between rooms yelling at each other.
ES: We thought it was clearer than ever that Harry and Ginny are an item and Ron and Hermione — although we think you made it painfully obvious in the first five books —
JKR: [points to herself and whispers] So do I!
ES: What was that?
JKR: [More loudly] Well so do I! So do I!
[All laugh; Melissa doubles over, hysterical, and may have died.]
ES: Harry/Hermione shippers - delusional!
JKR: Well no, I'm not going to - Emerson, I am not going to say they're delusional! They are still valued members of my readership! I am not going to use the word delusional. I am however, going to say — now I am trusting both of you to do the spoiler thing when you write this up —
[More laughter.]
JKR: I will say, that yes, I personally feel - well it's going to be clear once people have read book six. I mean, that’s it. It’s done, isn’t it? We know. Yes, we do now know that it's Ron and Hermione. I do feel that I have dropped heavy -
[/][All crack up][/i]
JKR: - hints. ANVIL-sized, actually, hints, prior to this point. I certainly think even if subtle clues hadn't been picked up by the end of “Azkaban,” that by the time we hit Krum in Goblet...
But Ron — I had a lot of fun with that in this book. I really enjoyed writing the Ron/Lavender business, and the reason that was enjoyable was Ron up to this point has been quite immature compared to the other two and he kind of needed to make himself worthy of Hermione. Now, that didn't mean necessarily physical experience but he had to grow up emotionally and now he's taken a big step up. Because he's had the meaningless physical experience - let’s face it, his emotions were never deeply engaged with Lavender -
[Much laughter in which Melissa emits a "Won-Won"]
JKR: - and he's realized that that is ultimately not what he wants, which takes him a huge emotional step forward.
ES: So he's got a little bit more than a teaspoon, now there’s a tablespoon?
JKR: Yeah, I think. [Laughter]
MA: Watching all this, were you surprised when you first logged on and found this intense devotion to this thing that you knew was not going to happen?
JKR: Yes. Well, you see, I'm a relative newcomer to the world of shipping, because for a long time, I didn't go on the net and look up Harry Potter. A long time. Occasionally I had to, because there were weird news stories or something that I would have to go and check, because I was supposed to have said something I hadn’t said. I had never gone and looked at fan sites, and then one day I did and oh - my - god. Five hours later or something, I get up from the computer shaking slightly [all laugh]. ‘What is going on?’ And it was during that first mammoth session that I met the shippers, and it was a most extraordinary thing. I had no idea there was this huge underworld seething beneath me.
ES: She’s putting it into a positive light!
JKR: Well I am, I am, but you know. I want to make it clear that delusional is your word and not mine! [Much laughter.]
MA: You're making our lives a lot easier by laying it on the table -
JKR: Well I think anyone who is still shipping Harry/Hermione after this book -
ES: [whispered] Delusional!
JKR: Uh - no! But they need to go back and reread, I think.
ES: Thank you. |
I hope that helps, you guys. I do hope that Ron and Hermione will open up a bit more in book seven; they really need to hook up.

That interview really made me laugh -- the whole thing, that is -- JKR is funny.
I'll post more later on Harry and Ginny. Right now I need to do some research!

Amanda
Just the Droobles
Feb 26 2006, 06:18 PM
JKR is a funny lady!
But who was the terrible person who spreaded around that JKR said H/Hr shippers were delusional? Emeson said they were delusional, and we know what a quality character he can be sometimes. Its not like she supported H/Hr, but she didn't call the shippers delusional. I was always under the impression that she had, because I had never read that article. But I'm really glad she didn't want to have delusional as her word. That shows some class on her part.
But I do think she makes it abundantly clear that it will be Ron and Hermione. She even confirms it. And I'm not complaining about that. But I think that is kind of a let down for those who do wish it were Harry and Hermione. Plus, that takes a lot of fun out of debates when you know one side has already sort of.....well, you know.
I don't think H/Hr shippers even want to be in here. Where are all of you guys!?!? Get in here and lets go!!
HaRRYPoTTeR FReaK
Feb 26 2006, 10:09 PM
Yes, JKR seems to have a good sense of humor.
JKR didn't want to call her readers 'delusional' like Emerson had. She put it in a much nicer perspective: that they need to go back and reread. So there is canon evidence supporting a R/Hr relationship.
She had, as you said, made it perfectly clear that there is room for a relationship between the two.
Have you read her interview about how Ginny would be the 'ideal woman' for Harry?
--Manda
Just the Droobles
Feb 27 2006, 09:10 PM
| QUOTE |
| Have you read her interview about how Ginny would be the 'ideal woman' for Harry? |
Actually, I haven't. I guess I don't look around enough or something...

. I always see people referring to those two interviews in particular and I'm like.....okay, I'll just talk about something else for the time being...
I always thought Ginny would be fine for Harry. It wasn't until the fifth book though that I had ever had a thought of them actually getting together. I just thought Ginny was going to like him and then go on with her business. But it turned out she had just lost hopse, but still liked him. And then it got all romantic and happy and blahdee blah and you know the story. I've always liked Ginny as a person. She's like me some of the time. I guess that's why I could relate.

. But I think that their two personalities go well together. They aren't too dependant on each other, so they can actually breathe. (Unlike Ron and Lavender, who literally, couldn't breathe

) Why don't people like Ginny? Can anyone who doesn't please tell me why you don't really care for her?
HaRRYPoTTeR FReaK
Feb 28 2006, 12:58 AM
I feel the same, JtD. (Do you mind if I call you that? It's easier to type than "Just the Droobles" you know.)

When I was reading OotP I noticed that Ginny was around a lot more, you know? She was in on most of the Trio's conversations and she spends time with them, tries to listen in on meetings with them. JKR was obviously setting up for something, pulling her in like that.
Then, in HBP, the truth comes out. She was setting them up for a relationship! That monster in Harry's chest, that was priceless, wasn't it?
I'll see if I can find that interview for you, yes? It was posted somewhere in a Ships debate thread. It was fairly long, so I'll edit this post when I find it, alrighty?
See you in a bit, then.
EDIT: Alrighty, here it is! I found it in the Ships forum, as I said, under Harry/Ginny Venom. Here it is.
| QUOTE |
JKR : [...]...the plan was, which I really hope I fulfilled, is that the reader, like Harry, would gradually discover Ginny as pretty much the ideal girl for Harry. She's tough, not in an unpleasant way, but she's gutsy. [...] I think she's funny, and I think that she's very warm and compassionate. These are all things that Harry requires in his ideal woman. But, I felt — and I'm talking years ago when all this was planned — initially, she's terrified by his image. I mean, he's a bit of a rock god to her when she sees him first, at 10 or 11, and he's this famous boy. So Ginny had to go through a journey as well. And rather like with Ron, I didn’t want Ginny to be the first girl that Harry ever kissed. That's something I meant to say, and it's kind of tied in.
One of the ways in which I tried to show that Harry has done a lot of growing up — in “Phoenix,” remember when Cho comes into the compartment, and he thinks, ‘I wish I could have been discovered sitting with better people,’ basically? He's with Luna and Neville. So literally the identical thing happens in “Prince,” and he's with Luna and Neville again, but this time, he has grown up, and as far as he's concerned he is with two of the coolest people on the train. They may not look that cool. Harry has really grown. And I feel that Ginny and Harry, in this book, they are total equals. They are worthy of each other. They've both gone through a big emotional journey, and they've really got over a lot of delusions, to use your word, together. So, I enjoyed writing that. I really like Ginny as a character. |
Yipee! Straight from the horse's mouth. Hehehe.
Just the Droobles
Feb 28 2006, 10:04 PM
| QUOTE |
| Do you mind if I call you that? It's easier to type than "Just the Droobles" you know.) |
JtD, Droobles, Droob, doesn't matter to me. Either way, I'll know you're talking to me.
Yeah, I started noticing Ginny really coming forward in book five and I really liked her that way a lot more than I liked her just staring at Harry and dipping her arm into the butter and what not. Oh, and that monster, that had to be the cheesiest, most silly thing I've ever read. Not that I didn't enjoy it all, but when you think about it, it's really cheesy.
Hey thanks for that interview.

Wow, I'm surprised at how much thought just went into a relationship! Think about how much time she must put in to some of the other more important plots! Geez, I wish I could write like that. I think that interview tells a lot about what is in store for the two, and a lot about how they came to be. I just wish we would've gotten more moments between the two in the last book so we could've seen how they were really working out. I'm counting on those in book seven. Which is growing larger and larger! Can't wait!!
Anglophile92
Mar 1 2006, 01:47 AM
I am a shipper of Ron and Hermione.

There always has been tension between them. Even though people are fond of Hermione and Harry, I don't see them together...ever. I believe in the end Harry will end up with no one. I think that Ginny will die

and Harry will move on...
But I can survive if Ginny and Harry becomes a couple. I will not howvever, live if Hermione and Ron are not together

. So I am a firm supporter of Ron and Hermione. I see them getting together in the last book, but it won't be this big deal. Even JKR hints about this shipper, and the cast all believes it!
As for Ginny and Harry, I think they are too different. Ginny is dating one boy after another and Harry just dated this one girl we all know: Cho. Ginny is more fierce and controlling than Harry. Even though we have seen Harry angry. Ginny is very brave as is Harry. That's the only connection I see between those two.
But hey, that's what I believe.
karsh05
Mar 18 2006, 04:11 PM
Well, I am one of the few and the proud Harry/Hermione shippers! I would say it's mainly because I'm totally and completely against Harry/Ginny ships. Yes, it was cute and all in HBP when Harry and Ginny got together, but I can just see (as I think someone else said previously) Ginny trying to get to Harry and screwing something up with his quest to find the Horcruxes. I know I'm making it sound like shes just a little girl, I'm not. I just don't think Ginny realizes the enormidy of the situation.
Just the Droobles
Mar 19 2006, 05:42 AM
Good to see a H/Hr shipper finally pop in here! But you only support it because you don't support H/G? Why not support R/Hr or some slash ships one?
I actually think Ginny is very intelligent. And I feel like I am the only one on here that thinks that sometimes. So many people don't like her but I just don't get it. I like her just fine. Now whether she is the exact right one for Harry, I dunno. I like her with Harry no doubt, but I don't ship H/G as strong as my other ship I prefer. Ginny and Harry are both very strong and very independent, which in a way makes them good for each other. They may be able to understand each other better as they have been through a few of the same type things. But that could also hurt them as they both may want to do their own thing and it may cause a fight or something.
I guess I am a lot like you, though in why I ship the way I do. I like Ginny, I like Harry. I don't like Cho, and I think Hermione and Ron need to get together, so Hermione can't be with Harry if I want her with Ron. Some may not think that is reason enough, but there are other things I won't get into until this debate ever gets started. Unfortunately, it's not looking too popular...
karsh05
Mar 19 2006, 05:54 PM

Droobles, can't seem to be able to make up your mind, can you?
I, well, I guess I should have rephrased myself. It's not exactly that I don't like the Harry/Ginny ship because I dont like Ginny (mind you, I still don't), but just because I think that the Harry/Ginny thing is just too much of a crush-thing. Also I think that Harry/Hermione are so cute together, and that even though they have two way different personalities, they kind-of add the missing piece to each other. I don't know, maybe I'm seeing Harry/Ginny as too much of a brother/sister relationship rather than a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship, just becuase the entire Weasly family is like Harry's family, so it just feels rather akward
Although, I still think that Ron needs to be with someone, and I guess Hermione wouldn't be too bad, but Harry already has dibbs on Hermione so he can back off. I dunno, I still cant see Hermione and Ron getting together very easily, because Ron has been just too awful to her in the past, and most of it has just been out of jelousy from the guy she was going out with in that place. So Ron needs someone who has had their share of pain, but is strong enough to show Ron how to treat a girl. Luna maybe?? or even Cho?????
Am I psyco...maybe
Just the Droobles
Mar 19 2006, 06:31 PM
| QUOTE |
| maybe I'm seeing Harry/Ginny as too much of a brother/sister relationship rather than a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship, |
That's true in a way, but iits funny you say that because I'm sure you know a lot of people think that about Hermione and Harry. They are so close but to me it is more of a best friends thing. I wouldn't say family necessarily, but they are really good friends and I just don't really see them as boyfriend/girlfriend as you don't see Harrry and Ginny like that.
Actually, my mind is pretty much made up, but I still have doubts on a few things, you know? I would prefer Ginny and Harry, no doubt, and obviously I like Ron and Hermione. Wouldn't you think Ron's jealousy that you mentioned was steamed by his liking for her? I think if he likes someone he's not going to be to happy that the person is going out with someone other than him. But that's sort of his fault since he waited around. But then he found dear Lavender...
And do you really think Ron has gone through that much pain in his life? His family is still in tact, and he's got nothing too traumatic. Luna has seen a death, and she's just weird. Does she like Ron? Or does she just googly eye everyone because that's the normal look on her face? And Cho....I could never see her with Ron. That's totally weird. And plus, he would be dating Harry's ex-girlfriend, and that doesn't always go down too well sometimes...
Can I ask you when you first started thinking it was Harry/Hermione?
karsh05
Mar 19 2006, 07:11 PM
Ummm...you know, to tell you the truth, I don't actually know! I have just kind of always seen Harry with someone like Hermione rather than someone like Ron. I just think that Ron and Hermione could never really get along perfectly. But from reading the books, I can see that its going to turn out that way, that by the end, everything between Ron and Hermione will spill over the edge, and it will be them to together. However, no matter how little hope it is for Harry/Hermione shippers, I'm still going for that over Harry/Ginny. So, really, its not nessesarily that I am TOTAL Ron/Hermione venom, but I am about that with Harry/Ginny, and I would much rather see Harry with someone more intellegent and who has been there with him whenever he needs it most, and I think Hermione is a best fit.
Am I crazy.......
.....yes.
Louise
Mar 19 2006, 09:35 PM
No, not at all...if you are, then I am too

I first started thinking H/Hr from their very first meeting. I just loved everything about the ship.
Since then, since I knew that R/Hr was canon, I've preferred the idea of Harry/Luna really - because I really loathe Ginny for one thing, but also because Luna makes Harry feel bad about some of the things he says and does, she stimulates his conscience, and that's something that IMHO makes for an exceptional relationship because there's balance there - but if I was given the choice, I'd still rather see H/Hr simply because I think they're a far better match - mentally and personality-wise - than Ron and Hermione.
I know loads of couple in real life who bicker like they do and everyone says the same thing - why they're together, they don't know. They're always quarrelling, always threatening never to speak to each other again etc...but you know what everyone says about couples like that? That they're so afraid of being on their own that they're prepared to put up with just about anything, just to say they're involved with someone. It's not love that keeps couples like that together...it's fear.
Not that I'm saying that's the way R/Hr will go of course, I'm just saying that bickering all the time isn't necessarily something cute - you have to ask yourself why they bicker.
Harry and Hermione don't bicker, but their bond of friendship isn't any the less for it, is it?
Capricorn
Mar 19 2006, 10:36 PM
I'm afraid I've been converted. I really don't like Ginny anymore. I didn't notice her aggresiveness when I first read HBP. I was just too interested in the main plot to care too much about the shipping going on. But since I started HBP again (and after reading a lot here about her change of character etc) I've just really grown to despise her. She was tolerable in OotP, but the platform was laid for her to become nicer, not nastier!
I kinda like Ron and Hermione - though I hope they will be nicer to each other once they've talked things over. Them being so imperfect in many ways, but still finding someone. However, they still have to get together. As their characters stand now I'm not too excited about them, because they haven't matured to the point where they can love each other in harmony. If they are handled with the same carelessness as Ginny and Harry...
I started liking Luna/Harry with the christmas party thing - that was the most selfless thing Harry had ever done, taking Luna to the party. I really liked him for that. Also in OotP where he gets mad when he hears that people steal Luna's stuff. Somehow Luna brings out the best in Harry - in my opinion anyway.
I just love Harry and Hermione as friends - no need for chemistry, though they still fill a hole in each others lives. They are indespensible to each other, but they just don't want to kiss. I wish I had a friend like that.
But I've typed a lot and I'm not the biggest shipper ever, so I'll just let you guys carry on.
Pixymajik
Mar 19 2006, 11:56 PM
| QUOTE (Michelle Dessler @ Mar 19 2006, 03:35 PM) |
I've preferred the idea of Harry/Luna really - because I really loathe Ginny for one thing, but also because Luna makes Harry feel bad about some of the things he says and does, she stimulates his conscience, and that's something that IMHO makes for an exceptional relationship because there's balance there - but if I was given the choice, I'd still rather see H/Hr simply because I think they're a far better match - mentally and personality-wise - than Ron and Hermione.
I agree with Capricorn that Harry and Hermione make great friends. And it's a solid support to the idea that guys and girls can be good friends without there being anything else between them.
As for Canon evidence for the relationships though--- give me another few days and it will be in here ) |
Ah Louise! You've almost convinced me to dedicate my shipping to Harry/Luna!

I've been working on a looooong analysis of Harry/Ginny-Ron/Hermione vs Harry/Hermione and I'm afraid that it's not quite ready for posting yet. But I wanted to come in and add a couple of thoughts.
I'm very much of the belief that a lot of people ship the way they do because of outside the books sources. Now this is where Canon becomes confusing, becausing a lot of people seem to refer to the movies as 'Canon', but those events don't happen in the books (or not like that exactly). Then people read a ship fanfic, or an outside source (aka, Interview with JKR) and decide that characters are particular traits or that relationships are/aren't meant to be.
I'm another who would rather see Harry with Hermione than Ginny. (Louise are you SURE that we can't have the Ginny debate in the Great Hall?

). However I'd also rather see Ron with Hermione over anyone else. I saw it as being logical that these four would end up being couples, as they've been the consistant group of 4 (slowly adding Neville, Luna etc) and Ron sure as heck can't end up with Ginny.
HaRRYPoTTeR FReaK
Mar 20 2006, 02:15 AM
| QUOTE (karsh05 @ Mar 18 2006, 10:11 AM) |
| Well, I am one of the few and the proud Harry/Hermione shippers! I would say it's mainly because I'm totally and completely against Harry/Ginny ships. Yes, it was cute and all in HBP when Harry and Ginny got together, but I can just see (as I think someone else said previously) Ginny trying to get to Harry and screwing something up with his quest to find the Horcruxes. I know I'm making it sound like shes just a little girl, I'm not. I just don't think Ginny realizes the enormidy of the situation. |
Hmmm.... You have a point there, mate. Ginny doesn't know anything about the horcruxes. I don't think she knows about the prophecy, either (or at least the whole thing and what it means). She isn't a first year anymore, that's for sure. I don't think Harry is going to tell her, for her own protection. Ginny is stubborn enough to do something stupid, like follow him when he goes to Godric's Hollow or Horcrux-Hunting. I don't think she's going to let him go that easy!
TerranOvermind
Mar 20 2006, 07:28 PM
*sails in on the HMS Harmony sipping a sunshine smoothie*….ahhhh….
Hello, everyone. It is an honor to join you all in the Great Hall. The presence of H/Hr shippers sure has been slight, but hopefully that will change soon. In the meantime, let’s debate, shall we?
First, let’s explore the current shipping situation as it stands at the end of HBP:
Neither H/G, R/Hr, or H/Hr has sailed at this time. Harry and Ginny have broken up for now; Ron and Hermione have not officially declared their feelings (we only have Harry’s musings); and Harry and Hermione are not exhibiting “romantic” gestures. They are all in mourning over Dumbledore, and all but Ginny are now fully committed to the quest for the remaining horcruxes and Voldemort’s defeat. Those are all facts based on canon material.
Next, we can observe some reasonable assumptions concerning these four characters. Ron has clearly always had feelings for Hermione, as evident to his jealous behavior and numerous attempts to make her see him in a better light. Ginny has had a crush on Harry from the beginning, started to lose hope, and was overjoyed when they finally got together, although briefly. Harry is a chaotic tornado of mixed feelings and emotions originating in everything from loss to responsibility to hormones. I’m sure he regarded his brief stint with Ginny a welcome relief amidst everything in his life. However, Harry only developed these feelings in book 6 (why didn’t he have this monster last year when she first mentioned dating Dean?). He has
always been aware of Hermione, though, as a very close friend, being concerned for her in times of danger and impressed with her magical prowess, but he has yet to regard her romantically. Now for the controversial character-Hermione. It is rather difficult to surmise how Hermione feels in the shipping scene because she is smart and has an introverted personality (not very outwardly expressive). However, it is clear that she, like Harry, has always been very concerned for and frequently impressed with him. It is also apparent that Hermione has regarded Ron as an inferior for most of the series, often giving disapproving looks and insults for his behavior.
Now, we can all agree that the fiercest conflict in shipping revolves around who ends up with Hermione. To illustrate the differences between these two ships, I offer the following comparison based on the movie
Just Friends I posted a few days ago:
Last Tuesday I bought a DVD, besides GoF of course, called Just Friends. As far as shipping goes, it is a very significant film that explores what many call the “Friend Zone”. This “zone” is the biggest argument that naysayers have against H/Hr-the platonic relationship. The main characters, Chris and Jamie, are the best of friends-they do everything together, even cheerleading, and have been totally comfortable around each other for most of their lives. However, recently, Chris has developed feelings beyond this, which Jamie does not echo (he starts to get tense, but she’s still comfy, even recklessly so). When unfortunate situations occur and his true feelings for her are brought out to the open, she responds with “I love you, too-like a brother”. What’s bad about this is that it’s possibly due to Chris’s looks (overweight and kinda dorky).
The fates spin around, and Chris ends up returning to his hometown after 10 years, having lost all the weight and become a successful executive. Suddenly Jamie sees him in a new light, considering him “date” material for the first time. The wounds of the past have changed Chris, however, and he only seems to want to get back at her. He proceeds to treat her like dirt, but deep down still holds special feelings.
The interesting aspect of the ensuing fiascos and disasters is that when Chris acts his worst toward Jamie, she resents and disowns him. When he shows compassion, decency, and harkens back to their past when they were in the “Friend Zone”, he wins her heart.
Now, we can all agree through canon evidence that Harry and Hermione share a much more profound connection than Chris and Jamie’s “Friend Zone”. Further, that H/Hr share a deeper psychological connection than R/Hr. How, then, shall we interpret and utilize the lessons learned in this movie?
Let’s look at what makes up the core foundations between the H/Hr and R/Hr “friend”ships spanning the length of the Harry Potter series.
Ron/Hermione:
-Constant malicious bickering (characteristic of extreme, uncompromising misunderstanding of each other)
-Condescending looks
-Emotional trauma
-Few “cease-fire” moments
-Bringing out the worst in each other
Harry/Hermione:
-Constructive arguments every now and then and only when necessary (smooth compromises and “cease-fires” reached swiftly)
-Beaming, encouraging looks and, unique to H/Hr, looks indicating subconscious communication (e.g. Malfoy’s “dogged” comment)
-True understanding of each other (e.g. birthday presents-Hermione gets Harry a Broomstick cleaning kit; Harry gets Hermione a book she has been wanting for a while; Ron gets Hermione some perfume which she regards like someone who’s been given a fruitcake. Which ones seem to really know the other?).
-Working well as a team (Philosopher’s/Sorcerer’s Stone challenges, Department of Mysteries battle, etc. Where’s Ron, by the way?)
-Bringing out the best in each other
Now compare all this to Chris and Jamie. Which friendship seems more likely to become a lasting relationship?
Some critics have observed and commented that most belonging to either the H/Hr or R/Hr ships have trouble seeing the other side’s viewpoints. Well, the viewpoints are simple: R/Hr-tension(lust), H/Hr-understanding(love). Naturally, these two ideas will clash in a battle of morals. One must realize, though, that lust is a temporary phase and very rarely leads to true love. In fact, it takes a great deal of effort to convert it to that state, and Ron and Hermione have definitely shown no signs of working toward that level of understanding. Harry and Hermione, however, have already reached that level long ago and only need a gentle nudge to make their relationship romantic.
My guess in all this is that we Harmonians ship the way we do because it is and has been so CLOSE to being realized. R/Hr shippers go their way because they feel that their ship has been working toward a climax throughout the series. What they don’t realize, however, is that there has not been any positive progress made in their ship. They have only witnessed a MASSIVE “cease-fire” as of HBP.There is a fault of which all ships are guilty, however. Often times, many will resort to taking mundane canon material and twisting it so that it “becomes” evidence. For example, there is a site that lists book quotes from the series that seem to support H/Hr at
http://harryloveshermione.com/extras/#quotes, yet many of them seem coincidental and less supportive than others. These types of evidence are usually met with either laughter or harsh scrutiny by opposing sides. My point: we are all the same, sharing the same struggles, only having differing opinions based on alternate perceptions. Therefore, being fans of Harry Potter, we should all strive to understand and respect one another.
TerranOvermind
Mar 20 2006, 07:29 PM
Also of note is an article by John Granger. He is an intelligent debater who, for the longest, supported R/Hr but was somewhat converted when he noticed certain abnormalities after HBP. The following is an excerpt of that article posted by AQHYAgrl:
*part of MN/TLC interveiw, snip*
For those of you who do not live in Harry Potter fandom, to understand what is happening here may be difficult. I learned the story only at the “Nimbus – 2003” conference at Walt Disney World where 67 papers and panel discussions were given about Harry Potter. Imagine my surprise in discovering there that the subject on many if not most of the several hundred people’s minds who flew from all over the world to attend was really just, “Who does Hermione favor romantically, Harry or Ron?”
This “shipping war” (“ship” as in “relationship”) was where almost every conversation began or arrived in short order. I learned that my interpretation of Harry’s two friends as the “quarrelling couple” of alchemy (sulphur and quicksilver) meant I was a “Ron/Hermione relationship man” or, more often, just an “R/Hr shipper.”
What struck me about this “shipping war” was that (1) both sides of this battle within fandom found it hard to remain open to ideas from a shipper in the opposite camp and (2) everybody whose opinion I valued seemed to be on the other side of the battleline from the team I had been adopted by (i.e., the smart money was with - or as least the more polite combatants I met were – the H/Hr shippers). I remained in contact with two of these “shippers” who have been a great help to me for more than two years in understanding fandom and Harry Potter.
In HP6, the shipping wars seemed to have ended with an unconditional and total victory for the Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny true believers. Though I had “no dog in the fight” and was assumed to be on the “winning side” because of my alchemical pairing, I confess to being incredulous at the mean spirited comments by Mr. Spatz and Ms. Anelli about the “delusional” opposition, comments that were if not echoed than at least encouraged by Mrs. Rowling’s responses. My two friends were gracious “losers” in their concession that they had been mistaken but I had to wonder at the insensitivity and self-importance shown by interviewers and author in this exchange.
*snip*
The recent interviews and Time magazine article, though, deserve a serious second look to answer the questions about Rowling that are raised in them, questions raised by Harry Haters or bona fide fans. Is she the secular goddess and despiser of Christian fantasy that she appears in Grossman’s Time magazine piece? Why is she so harsh in her comments about fans who speculated about her characters and turned out to be wrong? I think there are three reasons to suspect that things are not as they appear on the surface in Time magazine and in the other interviews.
First, there is Mrs. Rowling’s bizarre situation. She is 39 years old, a mommy to three young children, and, though she denies being a billionaire, is clearly one of the world’s richest women and almost certainly the world’s wealthiest artist or writer. Her success has been her ability to write six wonderful books and sustain fascination with her “back story” through each year’s adventures and from book to book. The publication of the sixth book in her seven book series presents something of a crisis in this situation.
She has remarried and had two children since the series began to be published – and, to her credit, she has made her family her priority despite her celebrity. In two interviews since HP6 was published she has said there will be at least another two year gap between HP6 and HP7 so she can have a year with her youngest daughter, MacKenzie. In answer to the question “how do you keep your kids grounded and normal and rooted in the real world?” (MN/TLC 3), she said:
JKR: It is my top priority in life, I think, and I hope that we lead a pretty normal life, believe it or not.
Her second priority – and one at least as difficult to achieve as the first, is protecting the ending of her story from escaping before Book 7 is published. If you have read the several interview links, you will find this one common thread in each; Mrs. Rowling is studied in her care not to reveal anything that will act as a “Spoiler” to the story not yet told. She admits to having told no one the ending of the books, to include her husband, and in answer to a question about what she would divulge if she were given veritaserum, she said:
JKR: Probably, truthfully, I would tell everyone the plot of Book seven, because there is always this huge conflict in my life in that half of me, at least half of me, would love to sit here and talk. It is fun. It would be great to sit here and talk about book seven and enjoy it with you people who really know the other books. That would be so interesting, but obviously the other half of me is well aware I do not think you really want me to do that. You are going to contradict me, but I think you would rather read it, wouldn’t you?
Lydia Hall: Yeah.
JKR: That is a relief.
*snip*
The best questions, consequently, in every one of the four interviews from which we have transcripts or partial transcripts, were given answers of “I’m not able to answer that,” and “I can’t say,” and “Good question! But answering that would be telling too much.”
She even explains in the MN/TLC interview that she has rules for herself in answering questions from reporters and readers.
JKR: I’ve never, to my knowledge, lied when posed a question about the books. To my knowledge. You can imagine, I’ve now been asked hundreds of questions; it’s perfectly possible at some time I misspoke or gave a misleading answer unintentionally, or I may have answered truthfully at the time and then changed my mind in a subsequent book. That makes me cagey about answering questions in too much detail because I have to have some leeway to get there and to do it my way, but never on a major plot point.
Rowling’s situation, then, in capsule form, is that of a mother whose first priority is the normalcy of her family’s life and of a writer protecting her story from “spoilers” she gives away and from speculators reviewing her every answer to question for clues to where she is headed in book seven.
This last, of course, has reached a new level of difficulty because there is only one book remaining in the series. One of the golden rules of detective fiction specifically and narrative fiction in general is that the author is obliged to lay out the necessary clues for the penetrating reader to discover before the last chapter or explanation of how and why the crime was done, from Holmes to Watson. The sudden revelation of a clue that the reader didn’t see in the course of the story or the presentation of a new character with inside information too close to the end (or of a familiar character acting “out of character”) is poor form or just cheating.
Rowling is certainly guilty of this with the Harry/Ginny relationship. Despite her protests that her “plan was, which I really hope I fulfilled, is that the reader, like Harry, would gradually discover Ginny as pretty much the ideal girl for Harry” (MN/TLC 3 – p 8), this “gradual discovery” happens all in Book 6. The careful reader of canon up to this point may see important things about Harry linking him to Ginny (especially after Rowling revealed her first name was not “Virginia” but “Ginevra” linking her with Harry the Arthur figure) but Harry shows little to no interest in her as a companion or friend until Half Blood Prince.
That Rowling says her plan was to reveal this gradually, however, reveals her mindfulness of the rules of the story she is writing. The need to reveal all the information necessary along the way to see where the story is going or how the deed was done makes her situation now very difficult. Her story is all told except for one book, her fans are penetrating readers, and all the clues should be in the books available. How can she protect her story’s conclusion from being revealed by clever readers?
Beyond not answering questions whose answers would “give away” the ending and disguising important clues in the previous six books with “red herrings” and “McGuffins,” Rowling I think has two ways of protecting her story. She can discourage reader speculation and she can point away from the direction her story is headed.
Reading the interviews Mrs. Rowling gave in the wake of the HP6 tsunami in light of her situation as a writer whose most obvious concern is the protection of her story, the possibility that her uncharacteristic appearance and comments may be intentional has to be taken seriously. I think this is evident in her almost hurtful remarks about those speculating about romantic relationships in her books and about Snape and from a review of her comments about C. S. Lewis and her faith.
I have printed at length her remarks about “ANVIL sized hints” that Harry/Hermione shippers were too stupid to pick up. In case you thought these remarks were just funny and not hurtful, please see http://www.petitiononline.com/4harmony/ for fans trying to pick up the pieces of their lives after she spoke about them this way. At least as curious for a woman so respectful of her fans were her comments about those who think Snape is a vampire:
ES: Was Dumbledore planning to die?
JKR: [Pause.] Do you think that's going to be the big theory?
MA & ES: Yes. It’ll be a big theory.
JKR: [Pause.] Well, I don't want to shoot that one down. [A little laughter.] I have to give people hope.
MA: It goes back to the question of whether Snape is a double-double-double-triple-
JKR: [Laughs] Double-double-quadruple-to-the-power-of - yeah.
MA: …whether this had been planned, and since Dumbledore had this knowledge of Draco the whole year, had they had a discussion that said, "Should this happen, you have to act as if it is entirely your intention to just walk forward and kill me, because if you don't, Draco will die, the Unbreakable Vow, you'll die," and so on —
JKR: No, I see that, and yeah, I follow your line there. I can't — I mean, obviously, there are lines of speculation I don't want to shut down. Generally speaking, I shut down those lines of speculation that are plain unprofitable. Even with the shippers. God bless them, but they had a lot of fun with it. It's when people get really off the wall — it's when people devote hours of their time to proving that Snape is a vampire that I feel it's time to step in, because there's really nothing in the canon that supports that.
ES: It's when you look for those things —
JKR: Yeah, it's after the 15th rereading when you have spots in front of your eyes that you start seeing clues about Snape being the Lord of Darkness. So, there are things I shut down just because I think, well, don't waste your time, there's better stuff to be debating, and even if it's wrong, it will probably lead you somewhere interesting. That's my rough theory anyway. (MN/TLC 2,18)
As one reader who thinks thee are more than a few clues – in each book, to include the most recent one – that Snape is a half-vampire (not least his title as a young man of “half-Blood Prince”!), this poke-in-the-eye was rather startling. ‘Shippers who studied her books and came to a conclusion different than the one presented in HP6 are angry, deluded, and militant – and “Snape is a Vampire” theorists are folks making things up about her stories and seriously “in need of a life”? As one fan wrote me:
JKR has shut down the Snape as vampire theory, but in her interviews it seems as if she doesn't understand where anyone came up with the idea. And yet, she in one more instance referred to Snape as being "bat-like" in HBP. And the idea of Snape assigning a were-wolf essay in PoA, then Lupin turning around and assigning a vampire essay. So, if Snape isn't a vampire, that's fine, but she really shouldn't be so surprised when her fans take small offhand details and start extrapolating fanciful theories. We've learned from her that the smallest details are the ones to look out for!
There are two reasonable alternatives here. Rowling is either insensitive to the feelings of her readership and was carried away in the excitement of the evening interview with two young people (who were enthusiastic R/Hr shippers and nay-sayers to Snape as vampire) – or there is a “method to her meanness.” I think both are possibilities and the second worth exploring.
The bashing of the “Snape as Vampire” theory is interesting both because of where it appears and what it doesn’t say. It appears after perhaps the most important question the two interviewers asked in their interview, “Was Dumbledore planning to die?” If Dumbledore planned to die, Snape’s killing the Headmaster makes the former potions master a probable hero and turns the surface story – how Harry and the wizard world understand events - on its head.
Rowling responds after a pause, “Well, I don't want to shoot that one down. [A little laughter.] I have to give people hope.” She then proceeds to mock a prevalent theory in fandom, one based on a multitude of clues left through the books, as being a fruitless theory that comes from a tired and over heated brain. The net effect of this, besides deflecting serious consideration of the Snape-as-hero story line possibility, is to mute any enthusiasm for speculating about the books’ final chapter. Who wants to wind up a Loser like the “H/Hr shippers” and the “Snape is Vampire” theorists?
What Rowling says about Snape and his being a vampire is curious, too. She denies that he is a vampire, which given her picture of a vampire in HP6, the hilarious Count Sanguini, makes real sense. Severus Snape is much more frightening and human than this throwaway comic caricature of a Blood Prince. But Rowling does not deny specifically that Snape is a “half vampire” which would be in keeping with the many half-blood and doppelganger characters that populate Hogwarts School (not to mention such a condition suggesting a relationship with Lily Evans, potions genius, in their N.E.W.T. potions class developing a vampire symptom cure akin to the Wolfsbane potion…).
Rowling’s chilling comments about shippers, vampires, and speculators in general, then, have the effect of “throwing a blanket” on readers trying to penetrate her story line. That she takes this tack for the first time just as the two year period between penultimate and final chapter begins suggests that she is acting deliberately to protect her story, as deliberately as she is in not answering questions that would point to how her story ends.
Rowling’s unique situation as a serial writer near story’s end provides the motivation for this approach but I think it is only believable if she has taken other steps to point away from where the story is headed. I believe we can see this in her abrupt turn from C. S. Lewis in these interviews.
In previous interviews Rowling has almost always listed Lewis as one of the authors she admires, has called him a “genius,” and has mentioned the Chronicles of Narnia books as some of her favorites (google Lewis’ name at the Harry Potter Lexicon site’s collection of her interviews for the several examples of these references www.hp-lexicon.org ). Not any more. We learned this July that she hasn’t read all of the Narnia books, if the “serious problem” she has with the series comes from a revelation in the book she says she has not read (curiously, the seventh book in that seven book series). Lev Grossman makes this revelation the feature point of his article on Rowling, in which he paints a portrait of a secular writer who has transcended the stuffy and traditional restrictions of Christian fantasy writers like Lewis.
*snip*
I am suggesting, in brief, that Rowling is consciously using the media and reporters to dampen the ardor of speculation about the final chapter and to steer what speculation remains away from her ending, an ending she has to have in some sense “given away” in the books already published. What makes me think this a serious possibility? The figure Rowling says she most resembles in the book is Hermione Granger – and Hermione has just such a savvy, manipulative relationship with the media.
It is Hermione who first realizes that intrusive, unthinking reporters can be mastered and “bottled” in Goblet of Fire. She recognizes that Rita Skeeter is an illegal blood-sucking animagus (Skeeter = mosquito…) and captures her in a bottle until she extracts a pledge to write only stories that don’t bash her and her friends. Hermione takes media manipulation to the heights in Phoenix by planting the Harry “exclusive interview” in the “alternative newspaper” rag called The Quibbler.
I have said more than a few times that the book Rowling’s novel most resembles is not The Lord of the Rings or the Narnia Chronicles (however much her seven book series reflects the thinking and seven book series of Lewis and Tolkien) but Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. In the guise of children’s book and fantasy adventure, Rowling like Swift is delivering biting satire of modern institutions from government and schools to courts and prisons. The most acidic of her caricatures, I think, is of the Fleet Street media in her Daily Prophet articles and reporter as well as The Quibbler.
Rowling clearly holds the press in disdain and at careful arms length. This is reflected outside her stories as well in her not speaking to the press except at unavoidable moments like book and movie releases (and then only to one or two professional reporters). She developed a web site in order to by pass the media and speak to her fans directly.
Is it not credible, then, that she may have manipulated Lev Grossman to portray her as a Lewis-despising, secular “Goth with cleavage”? I confess to thinking it not only credible but hilariously likely.
I think it a real possibility, too, because of the times in these interviews that Rowling says her special talent as a writer is in the deliberate way she writes – and to a specific underlying theme of her books.
Rowling believes that the difference between good and bad writers is largely a matter of planning. Good writers plan extensively, bad writers count on inspiration and the story developing as they write:
Alexandra Le Couteur Williamson for the South Australian Advertiser - When you start, do you do a complete plan before you start writing, or do you just have an idea from the start and then just keep writing.
where it takes me". Sometimes writing and seeing where it takes you will lead you to some really good ideas but I would say nearly always it won't be as good as if you sat down first and thought: Where do I want to go, what end am I working towards, what would be good, a good start? Sorry, very dull. (CBBC, p 7)
She says she intends to spend months planning Book 7 next year before writing it and is known to have spent seven years planning the novels and writing “back story” before completing Philosopher’s Stone. A question I am often asked is if I really think Rowling has deliberately inserted the symbolism she has and intentionally chosen the alchemical and hero journey’s formulae she uses. For such a deliberate writer and careful planner, I think the question reflects on the surprise and ignorance of the reader and even some latent misogyny. Can a blonde bombshell in “at the very least three inch steel spike heels” writing children’s books be that smart? Yes, indeed.
And, mirabile dictu, in the MN/TLC interview she points in an aside to her traditional bearings and foundation in these books. In answer to yet another risible question from the fan site reporters (“There aren’t a lot of Death Eater children in the other houses, are there?”), Rowling says:
JKR: You will have people connected with Death Eaters in the other houses, yeah, absolutely.
ES: Just in lesser numbers.
JKR: Probably. I hear you. It is the tradition to have four houses, but in this case, I wanted them to correspond roughly to the four elements. So Gryffindor is fire, Ravenclaw is air, Hufflepuff is earth, and Slytherin is water, hence the fact that their common room is under the lake. So again, it was this idea of harmony and balance, that you had four necessary components and by integrating them you would make a very strong place. But they remain fragmented, as we know. (MN/TLC 3, p 10)
The interviewers are so taken by this answer that they then ask her, “Was James the only one who had romantic feelings for Lily?” Pardon my sarcasm and disappointment. Rowling begins a discussion on four element theory and the process of integrating them into a strong harmony and balance, i.e., literary alchemy, and the reporters take us back immediately to a peripheral shipping issue.
*snip*
If I am right, then, in suggesting that Rowling’s situation on the cusp of writing her last book in her series of seven books (a cusp on which she hopes to keep the world waiting for two years so she can fulfill her responsibilities as a mother to a new born) and that she is deliberately muting and misdirecting speculation about her last Harry Potter book, where does that leave us? Well, we have to proceed down the trails she points away from if we want to know where she is really going.
These trails are, most notably, a love relationship between Harry and Hermione, Snape being some kind of vampire (if not a Count Sanguini!), Harry being Heir of Gryffindor, and Draco Malfoy being redeemed. Are these possibilities in any way credible?
Snape’s being a half-vampire makes a certain amount of sense and opens possibilities of a debt or love he owes to Harry’s mother Lily. Harry being Heir of Gryffindor Rowling does not deny explicitly in her interview and this creates a space for Harry’s being in some macabre fashion a Voldemort Horcrux (who will have to sacrifice himself to defeat the Dark Lord a la Carton/Aslan). The importance of Draco Malfoy’s redemption makes Dumbledore’s sacrifice and Snape’s actions on the Astronomy Tower understandable and inspiring.
But a love relationship between Harry and Hermione? Hasn’t HP6 and the Ron/Hermione, Harry/Ginny pairing put that to rest forever?
Yes and no.
As important as the Ron/Hermione pairing is to the alchemical drama in each book and the series as a whole, there are several reasons to believe that this is not the end of the story, beyond the suggestion that Rowling is pushing so hard for us to accept this conclusion in story and interviews.
The ending of HP6, for example, is different than all other book endings in this series. At the cauda pavonis of the phoenix rising from Dumbledore’s tomb, we have a curtain closing that marks the end of the white stage of the alchemical drama. As I have explained at length in my book and at postings on my site, Phoenix was the nigredo or black stage of the alchemical work and Prince the white stage or albudo. All that is left is the red stage to complete the alchemical process. We don’t return to King’s Cross Station with Harry at the end of HP6 because the next book will be significantly different than this one.
We are cued to this by the multiple pairings and seeming resolution of contraries and conflicts at the end of Prince. Not only do we seem to know at last that Snape is the bad guy Harry has thought him to be since he first laid eyes on him, but Harry is resolute and focused on his mission to destroy the Horcruxes and Voldemort. We also have a relationship ending that points to multiple Shakespeare plays and Austen novels in the coming together of the painfully separated and obviously always meant for each other pairs, namely, Lupin-Tonks, Harry-Ginny, and Ron-Hermione. All is set as the Dynamic Trio head out for the Final Battle with Voldemort (tune in, same bat time, same bat channel, 2007!).
Or is it set? Harry, for example, at story’s end leaves Ginny and says they cannot be a pair. Ron and Hermione swear fealty to Harry in the battle to come, this friendship transcending whatever relationship the two may have or hope to have. I suspect that Ron/Hermione is not a ‘ship that will ever see a wedding.
Why not?
First, there is the alchemy. The “quarrelling couple” die in the red stage of alchemy and in the final resolution of these contraries the Philosopher’s Stone is perfected. Ron and Ginny as the red headed part of this group might be expected to die in the red stage novel as Sirius Black died in Phoenix and Albus “the white” Dumbledore died in Prince (Rubeus Hagrid is a better bet for this role because his first name means “red” and suggests the “Res Bis” of alchemical perfection but we have seen quite a few hints that Ron and other Weasleys will not survive the books).
Next, there is the meaning of the trinity involved. Harry-Ron-Hermione is a page out of Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamazov and several other important books and movies (see Looking for God in Harry Potter, p 88) in being a spirit-mind-body tryptich. In good order, Spirit directs mind and body – and both body and mind/will serve spirit sacrificially. Our choice in endings here comes down to a pairing off of body and will a la Princess Leia and Hans Solo (Brother Luke being left out, sort of) or the Mt. Doom ending of The Lord of the Rings where passionate Gollum is sacrificed and willing Sam and spiritualized Frodo live on.
Last, there is the over arching meaning of these stories, namely, Love’s victory over death. What love we see in Prince is romantic love or eros. It is an important aspect of love, certainly, but it is as surely not the power behind the door in Department of Mysteries or the power that Voldemort “knows not.” This sacrificial and transcendent love that Harry has in abundance and which is his only hope in defeating Voldemort is agape or a selfless love much greater than romantic love.
As implausible as it must seem now, I think that this is the love that Hermione has for Harry (and that Ron feels for his best friend, too), which, if Ron and Ginny die – and Harry doesn’t!), could also lead to the final pairing of the books.
Conclusion
Let me wrap up this speculative discourse by asking and answering three questions I imagine an intelligent reader has to be asking at this point.
1. Is Rowling as clever as the Canadian Catholics that created almost ex nihilo the widespread belief that Pope Benedict XVI actively opposes Harry Potter? Is she capable of deliberately misleading the media and fandom?
Yes, I think she is capable of this. That she has consciously distanced herself and her family from the media and that a character in her books she says she resembles consciously manipulates the media each make the scenario I’m suggesting a possibility worthy of some consideration.
2. In doing this, is she trying to protect the ending of her story?
This is the only reasonable motive she might have. Her situation as a serial novelist nearing the end of a fifteen year project, her determination in interviews and courtrooms to prevent “Spoilers,” and the changes in direction she displays in recent interviews both in berating fans who speculate about the books ending and with respect to C. S. Lewis make sense if she is trying to mute and misdirect speculation.
3. So what?
The best and most pressing question!
I hope I have not spent the time to write all this out because I am overly invested in Harry/Hermione shipping, Snape-as-half-vampire predictions, or any of the other theories that Rowling seems to have shut down in her July 2005 interviews. I acknowledge this over-investment reaction must be considered a real possibility, as embarrassing as this must be. If I don’t blush in suggesting that some part of Byatt’s and O’Brien’s inability to comprehend Rowling’s genius comes from professional envy, I’ll have to admit my speculating about Rowling here might be more than half disappointment about what she has said in recent interviews.
What I prefer to think I’m pointing out is something very important about Rowling’s accomplishment as a writer. I’ve alluded above to a writer’s obligation to train readers in the stock responses and to “instruct while delighting.” As I’ve written elsewhere, her treatment of the themes of choice, prejudice, death, and change in these books places her among the greats. Her use of traditional Christian imagery in story form also marks her as a writer in the English traditions of writing faith edifying literature, what is often called “baptizing the imagination” or “smuggling the gospel.” My first book is largely about Rowling along these lines.
Louise
Mar 20 2006, 07:45 PM
First of all, let me say how absolutely delighted I am to see this thread a bit more active of late

Brings back the good 'ole days...*sighs nostalgically*
| QUOTE (Shelly) |
| Louise are you SURE that we can't have the Ginny debate in the Great Hall? |
Did I say that we couldn't?

'Cos if I did, I was only joking

You guys want a Ginny bashing *ahem*
discussion thread, then I'm sure that can be arranged

Terran, I agree with almost everything you said, particularly this bit...
| QUOTE |
Well, the viewpoints are simple: R/Hr-tension(lust), H/Hr-understanding(love). Naturally, these two ideas will clash in a battle of morals. One must realize, though, that lust is a temporary phase and very rarely leads to true love. In fact, it takes a great deal of effort to convert it to that state, and Ron and Hermione have definitely shown no signs of working toward that level of understanding. Harry and Hermione, however, have already reached that level long ago and only need a gentle nudge to make their relationship romantic.
|
I have no doubt that, unfortunately, HMS Pumpkin Pie has been sunk. When you hear it from JKR herself, I don't think anyone can logically deny it. That being said, we are perfectly within out rights - and, as Terran has shown - to point out that literary-wise, the R/Hr ship is very poor. I would equate it to the shallowness (at least on one parties part) of the relationship between Willoughby and Marian in 'Sense and Sensibility'. Marian very quickly came to realise that love, real love, is quiet and unassuming and comes most often when you least expect it, born of friendship, respect and understanding - everything that Colonel Brandon gave her and Willoughby couldn't possibly understand. What makes a relationship last is far deeper than physical attraction, lust, circumstance or ideal - people are who they are and you either take them as they are or you leave them. 'Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds', or words to that effect, as Shakespeare said.
I've always been left far more affected by the type of relationship that existed between Marianne and Brandon, or Darcy and Elizabeth for example, than the type of rip-your-clothes-off "I hate you-I love you" lust that goes on in books and films. There's a huge difference between the two - one lasts, the other one doesn't. Even if R/Hr did stay together, they'd get on each other's wick pretty soon.
Now Harry and Luna - there's a sweet ship if ever I saw one. I really thought that's the way JKR was heading for a while in HBP and I was delighted...even though it was at the cost of my usual H/Hr ship. I accepted R/Hr, even though I didn't like it, because at the end of the day, it was really Harry's happiness that I cared about the most. As an alternative to Hermione, Luna certainly brought something out in Harry that was far more Austen-like than the absolute bunkum Ginny's brought out in him, which has brought Harry down quite a few pegs in my estimation.
TerranOvermind
Mar 20 2006, 07:59 PM
| QUOTE (Michelle Dessler) |
| I have no doubt that, unfortunately, HMS Pumpkin Pie has been sunk. |
On the contrary, I believe H/Hr is FAR from being sunk. Check out the article by John Granger posted above and see why. The seventh book has not been released yet.
It’s not over.
Louise
Mar 20 2006, 08:56 PM
Oh don't get me wrong, I would love to think that you're right, really I would

But...well...see, that delusional comment really stung and it was something of a huge wake-up call for me regarding theories. Which is why I don't indulge much in any theory threads these days, other than the Snape ones. I don't think the stories are that complex, but I don't want to get any more

so I'll stop there now

I will always be a Harmonian in spirit though and I shall defend the HMS Pumpkin Pie from my little lifeboat until my weary little arms can paddle no more....
Or at least until the seventh book comes out anyway
Just the Droobles
Mar 20 2006, 09:59 PM
Louise...*sigh*
Harry and Luna does seem like a nice ship doesn't it? Now that you have put it like that. I always thought Luna acted all dreamy-like toward Ron, but she's sort of difficult to read...I do think I could stand Harry being with Luna. I'm not as attached to H/G as I am to R/Hr. That is my thing. I'm attached to Ron, so Ron needs his girl, and if he gets his girl, Harry can't have her, so you get my drift.
To tell you the truth, I used to be really worried about the ships in the books. Book 5 threw a lot of iffy things in there. But apparently, I'm one of the few people (at least in here) who did see the advances in Ron and Hermione's relationship in book 6. To me, Ron learned that having someone like Lavender was not a 'relationship'. I think he learned to appreciate Hermione more. And when she wouldn't talk to him because of his own actions, I think he really did miss her. Hermione also had a wake up call when Ron was poisoned. They started talking again after that. IMHO, I think she realized people could be gone in a heartbeat, and you shouldn't stay mad at someone forever.
I think we were left hanging on the ships in book 6. Harry broke up with Ginny--will they get back together??

Ron and Hermione looked pretty snuggly at the funeral(which, might I say, You don't see then doing too often)--will they get together??

Luna is still there and her presence is ominously creeping into Ron and Harry's life--will she date either of them??

JKR already quashed her and Neville so...
I think we might need a Ginny "discussion" because I don't really get why people don't like Ginny. I've always liked her, but maybe I need to read HBP again. I'm slowly making my way back through the series. BACK ON TOPIC!
TerranOvermind...those have to be the longest two posts ever. Good points, but I can't really agree with the bulk of it because I don't like H/Hr. I also think it is very one-sided, which was probably its purpose, but it didn't really explore the positive aspects of R/Hr or the negatives of H/Hr. I think the bickering is prominent in a lot of H/Hr shippers minds, but to me the bickering is all fumed by jealousy. Ron and Hermione get along fine when Viktor, Fleur, McLaggen, and Lavender aren't around. And yes, Hermione is jealous of Ron too, not just Ron jealous of Hermione. She never got jealous of Cho or Ginny... And it was pointed out that Hermione gives Ron a lot of disappointed looks. There were looks flashed at Harry too. You can't just throw those out the window. Harry and Hermione have had fights too, so it isn't completely Ron and Hermione.
Can I ask what Pumpkin Pie is? Well, I know what pumpkin pie is, but how is it in your terms? I assume it is something H/Hr by context, but...
TerranOvermind
Mar 20 2006, 10:22 PM
| QUOTE (Just The Droobles) |
| Harry and Hermione have had fights too, so it isn't completely Ron and Hermione. |
We realize this, and I believe it was covered in the previous posts. The difference is that H/Hr’s arguments are “constructive”, not “destructive” toward each other. Their arguments are settled smoothly, do not last nearly as long, and generally tend to help the other, not belittle them. This suggests that they see each other’s sides more easily than R/Hr do, which in turn suggests more understanding.
| QUOTE (Just The Droobles) |
| Can I ask what Pumpkin Pie is? Well, I know what pumpkin pie is, but how is it in your terms? I assume it is something H/Hr by context, but... |
This is from portkey.com:
The Tale of the HMS Pumpkin Pie
Once upon a time, there was a writer and H/H shipper named Cassandra Claire. She was in the middle of writing the fourth chapter of a story called Draco Veritas. And, being the good, H/H shipper she is, decided to post a snippet of an H/H snog on to this board. Her snog was angsty and steamy and made many of us blush.
It also kicked our muses into high gear. A call was heard all 'round the great ship H/H (as it was then known) for snoglets of any type involving our two heroes.
Many people posted and there was one (by Narri) in which our hero, Harry, coming from a feast, tasted like pumpkin pie. No one is sure why this particular tidbit or turn of phrase caught on, but it did, sweeping through the ship like pink-eye in an elementary school.
Many, *many,* of the snoglets that followed described Harry as tasting like pumpkin pie. There were even whole ficlets built around our two heroes and pumpkin pie.
In short, pumpkin pie became our unofficial mascot, until one day, after many snogs and ficlets, someone said, "Let us forthwith be called the HMS Pumpkin Pie."
And, that, my friends, is the story of the great ship, HMS Pumpkin Pie.
Just the Droobles
Mar 20 2006, 10:33 PM
| QUOTE (TerranOvermind Posted on Mar 20 2006 @ 04:22 PM ) |
| In short, pumpkin pie became our unofficial mascot, until one day, after many snogs and ficlets, someone said, "Let us forthwith be called the HMS Pumpkin Pie." |

That's actually really funny. Thanks for that though. Now I won't feel stupid when people mention that. But I have actullay forgotten the basis behind the "Believe in Tress" (which led to Saws) and that's a little sad considering I think it has to do with R/Hr and that's my ship...
I see your point on the fights. But I would like to point out the fight they had when Hermione caused Harry's broom to get taken away. He didn't talk to her for a very long time. Course she was hurt by Ron and Harry at that point (because of Scabbers and the broom) so she was pretty distraught as well. But that fight did last a long while. And if I recall right, it was Ron who stood up and said he would help Hermione with Hagrid's case, which ended the fight. Harry didn't step up, but that also ended their little quarrel. Mind, Ron and Hermione are a bit more...harsh...at some times...Course Harry sort of lashed out at everyone in the 5th book...and now I'm just rambling...
Kells bells
Mar 23 2006, 05:29 PM
I am quick an odd shipper because I don't really pay so much attention to what is going to happer, but I think about what should happen.
And I'm a Harry/Ginny shipper but not a Ron/Hermione shipper.
They (Ron and Hermione) are bickering so much and take forever to make up.
I originally liked it but now... mneh. Not at all.
I also think that loads of really bad fanfics must have spoilt it for me. The ones that take the chaercters out of canon and what basically happens is this.
Ron: I love you Hermione.
Hermione: I love you Ron.
-They jump into bed completely attached to each other-
So thats one reason why I don't like this ship.
By the way, the HMS Pumpkin Pie thing is hilarious.
*goes into a daydream about Harry tasting of pumpkin pie...*
TerranOvermind
Mar 23 2006, 05:31 PM
| QUOTE (Just the Droobles) |
| But I would like to point out the fight they had when Hermione caused Harry's broom to get taken away. |
Ah, yes, but one must take into account the entire situation. Sirius Black, a convicted murderer apparently with every reason to harm Harry, was on the loose. The package the broom came in was unmarked. Harry was well known by this time by pretty much all of the wizarding world as an exceptional Seeker that loved Quidditch. Hermione was right to be suspicious when the broom came up so soon after Harry’s old one was destroyed. She worried for his safety. Quidditch was the one thing, in Harry’s mind, that he was good at and enjoyed. Taking this broom from him was like taking a part of himself away, therefore devastating. The situation was so complicated that an argument was inevitable. It was also the largest one between them in the series, but again, it was
constructive. When it was over, Harry realized and admitted that Hermione was only looking out for him, and it strengthened their friendship, ending on a
positive note.
Further illustrating the arguments issue is a link provided by Nymphe in the H/Hr thread that explores a theory based on J.K. Rowling’s use of adverbs. You can read about it
here.
Possibilities…Recently it has come to my attention that my previous posts have caused a little distress within some supporters of the R/Hr ship, making them question their established conceptions as of HBP. Not trying to sound too harsh, but that’s actually good! Socrates, a well-known Greek philosopher, taught his students by asking questions so that they could make up their own mind about things and not take them at face value. Even Rowling herself stated that eagle-eyed readers would pick up on some clues at the end of HBP. While I am in no way Socrates, allow me to elaborate on a universal question posed throughout the Harry Potter series—“Is it possible?”
| QUOTE (mxnhpfreak) |
| I told you I could have believed (H/Hr) before HBP |
This admission has been echoed by many in the fandom, even some who support R/Hr.
Book 6 was unusual in many ways, several of which mentioned in the John Granger article. I, like you, was affected emotionally by all the events that transpired. I thought it was cute that Harry finally had a crush on Ginny after all these years. I even smiled when they kissed in front of everyone and began accepting them as a couple. I recognized the behavior between Ron and Hermione as a mutual attempt at making the other jealous, and near the end, like H/G, gradually accepted them as a couple, too, even though it was distressing to me as a H/Hr shipper. I was torn to pieces when Snape supposedly killed Dumbledore, which seemed to confirm that Harry was right about him all along. All this came from a straight reading of the book.
However, even while reading all these events, especially those involving Dumbledore’s death, something in the back of my mind kept telling me “this doesn’t feel right”. Too many questions kept popping up:
--Is Snape really evil? Dumbledore, a wise man, has always vouched for him, even after Snape’s involvement with the prophecy was revealed.
--Since Hagrid overheard them talking in the forest, was this whole thing planned?
--How come the Avada Kadavra curse blasted Dumbledore in the air? Every other time, the victim simply dropped to the floor or ground.
--Isn’t it interesting that Dumbledore offered Malfoy a way out of his obligation to Voldemort, saying that he could hide him more completely than he could possibly imagine and that Voldemort couldn’t kill him if he was already dead?
--Why wasn’t Dumbledore’s wand found or mentioned?
--Phoenix tears have healing powers. Fawkes was doing a LOT of crying that night. Could this mean…?
--Why was Dumbledore’s body shrouded from view?
--What was the phoenix Harry saw briefly before the tomb was sealed?
--What did the look of revulsion Snape had before casting the curse mean, and how does it relate to him yelling at Harry not to call him a coward?
--Where are Voldemort and Wormtail? What are THEY doing during all this?
--Back to the ships, how come Harry only becomes jealous in regards to Ginny in book 6? He did not have evil “monster” thoughts about Dean only a few months before when Ginny first mentioned them dating or of any of Ginny’s other boyfriends for that matter.
When all these questions started coming up, I had to ask a broader question: Is it possible?
--Is it possible Snape is still good?
--Is it possible Dumbledore is still alive?
--Is it possible that Harry and Ginny’s relationship is shaky at best?
Is it possible that many of the events that transpired in HBP were in fact attempts at misdirection orchestrated by Mrs. Rowling? She has misdirected us before in earlier installments, and the series hasn’t ended yet.
If this is true, what else is possible?
--Is it possible that H/G and R/Hr will not sail despite all that happened supporting them? Harry and Ginny DID break up, and Ron and Hermione have not come right out and said they were a couple yet.
--Is it possible that H/Hr may end up together in the end, especially if Ron and/or Ginny end up dying in the seventh book? (see various theories)
--For that matter, is it possible that Rowling may go for broke and kill off Hermione, effectively destroying the two main ships?
--Are all the things that were mentioned in John Granger’s article possible?
The point is that we shouldn’t accept things just as they were told to us. We should go deeper to find out the possibilities and hopefully the truth. Is it possible that some of us are going too deep with this? Yes, that is a possibility, and I can honestly say that I will admit that I was wrong should everything that happened in HBP turn out to be true. However, given our past experiences with the genius of J.K. Rowling’s writing, should we be so naïve as to think she would not pull a fast one on us?
No, until the last book is released and all is revealed, we have no choice but to ask ourselves:
“Is it possible?”
And as I’ve said before, we are all Harry Potter fans enduring the same struggles as we attempt to comprehend it all. We should strive to understand, respect, and support one another despite our differences. If we do this, perhaps when everything is said and done, we may even become friends.
Just the Droobles
Mar 23 2006, 11:33 PM
I could go on and say, Sure. It's possible. But it's not probable. But a lot of people don't like it when I do that. But it's the truth, and I'll take that subject no further.
| QUOTE (Kells bells Posted on Mar 23 2006 @ 11:29 AM ) |
| I also think that loads of really bad fanfics must have spoilt it for me |
That's understandable, but you kind of have to be able to tell the difference between canon and Fandom. I am reading a fanfic about Sirius/Lupin and I can't tell you that I most certainly remember that that is in the world of Fandom. You just have to remember to look at the books. Plus, it would be out of character for Ron or Hermione to go "I love you! Lets go into my room...." That would be out of character for any of them.
| QUOTE (TerranOvermind Posted on Mar 23 2006 @ 11:31 AM ) |
| She has misdirected us before in earlier installments, and the series hasn’t ended yet. |
Ms. Rowling has never misdirected us. She has left clues and plot lines that have holes in them which are open for discussion. If you would like to give me an example of her misdirection, I would be glad to see it. And something so large as Ron and Hermione, which I think has become so terribly obvious (even to some H/Hr shippers I know) that would be a terrible mistake for JKR to string us along so badly and yank us in another direction. That's not coming from the R/Hr shipper in me, that's coming from the good writing lover inside me. I think if she would've wanted H/Hr to end up, we would've seen more romantic/sexual tension, which we actually have seen absolutely none of. All I see is a fantastic friendship.
I actually think one of the boys will die, not Hermione, and I believe it will most definitely be Ron. Ron is very important to a lot of the characters in the book, so it would be at the greatest emotional cost to the characters to lose him. But I don't think that will leave the door open for H/Hr either.
smee
Mar 26 2006, 07:17 PM
The misdirection argument does seem to be popular one. Fair enough JKs a tricky character but she's
never lied to us. If she has I would very much like an example of a down right lie she has told HP fans. I make this point because in her interviews (come on now, you know the one I mean, I don't need to quote it; everyone knows the thing off by heart

) she has stated that her ships are R/Hr and H/G and she writes the books guys so those are the ships that will sail in book 7.
Now I'm not saying that R/Hr, H/G are the best ships or the right ones or whatever because that is a matter of personal opinion; if you'd
rather see Harry and Hermione together that's totally cool but you can't think it's actually going to
happen in the books, not after what JK has said.
Louise
Mar 26 2006, 08:25 PM
See, here's the thing....
I'm a H/Hr shipper, obviously...I've never hidden that and I felt it just as much as my fellow Harmonians when the interview came out. Really I did. But I think that my fellow Harmonians who are arguing that there's a possibility of this ship happening in book seven...now please understand, I'm on your side guys...well, they're damaging our cause. To still insist that it's going to happen when JKR has said it won't is a worse sort of delusion than anything we were under before. Droobles and smee are right - she's never outright lied. Misdirected yes, but not lied.
So arguing from the corner that there's still a possibility of this happening is rather pointless now. I really empathise, honestly I do, but we really do need to accept reality at some time.
Now, if we want to argue that R/Hr and G/H sucks from a literary stance, great stuff - there is plenty of fodder there...gallons of it, huge great big essays full of it. That's really what I'd love to see happening in this thread rather than 'it ain't happening', 'yes it is' arguments.
Just the Droobles
Mar 26 2006, 09:45 PM
I understand what you are saying, Louise, though I am not a H/Hr shipper. Amyrat151 gave us a link to a site. It is a H/Hr shipping site, and this essay has to be one of the most intelligent shipping essays I have ever read. I'm not saying that because I'm not the same shipper they are, but I think it was very spectacularly written.
Dodging Anvils (last time I went to it, it gave me a bandwidth exceeded notice for the site. If it gives you that, perhaps check in another time.

)
I wouldn't mind discussing whether the R/Hr ship or the H/G ship sucks, though I highly believe one does not, but if that's what we'd like to go into rather than the "whether this will happen" garb, I'm all for it.
smee
Mar 27 2006, 06:12 PM
Yep, I'm all for that. Although I honestly believe that it's entirely a matter of personal opinion (as most things are). I mean; which ship gives you that warm, fuzzy, kind of excited feeling inside when you think about it? That's what it's all about; no matter what anyone else says or even what JK writes in the last book.
muggleview
Mar 30 2006, 03:54 AM
A new debate thread? Louise, you are much calmer now than before. Glad to see you active again. No, I am not going to put any argument (yet!). Just want to explore the possibility.
It's possible that Harry Potter series will have an open-ending. By the time Year 7 is over, Harry, Ron, Hermione and Ginny will still be under 20. Many things can happen in the coming years. They may make promises to each other which they would regret later in the future. Or life can take unexpected turns. So there is always a possibility that each of the pairings may happen.
We have to see how Jo Rowling will tie all knots. If she reduces the number of characters so much and close the door to the Wizarding world, then only Harry and Hermione may survive and live in the Muggle world. Whether they will become romantic couple is not relevant. The ending will thus be something like: "The entrance to the platform 9 3/4 is forever blocked. No more wizards and witches to be seen at King's Cross. The entrance to Diagon Alley is also closed, although the Tavern is still open for a few odd people talking about strange past events."
On the other hand, the Wizard world thrives forever and, as ever, separated from the Muggle World. Harry Potter has nobody to long for in the Muggle World (certainly not the Dursleys), so he firmly lives in the Wizard World. Only Hermione still travels between the two worlds and maintains both currencies in her pocket, in case if her children would visit either side of grandparents. Here we can assume that the Weasleys become the uniting community for all characters. Harry is part of them. Hermione is part of them. Thus that's how they live happily ever after, with their respective spouses.
Cheers,
Muggy
smee
Apr 5 2006, 11:40 AM
http://www.mugglecom.net/This spoof is hilarious. If you read nothing else on this site read Veelas Column (under Discussion on the left).
So funny I almost wet myself. I know a lot of people take their shipping very seriously (me included) but you've got to be able to laugh at yourself and this is great!
Just the Droobles
Apr 5 2006, 03:39 PM
You know, I think as a R/Hr shipper, it is easier for me to laugh at. However, if I was a H/Hr shipper, I don't think it would be as easy. I know Emerson keep giving all of them a lot of grief and I really wish he would just shut up sometimes because he makes the rest of us look bad.
I believe that we are with the ship that is most likely going to happen. Some of the others know it, and some don't. But I don't think that gives us the right to rub it in their faces. (I'm not harping on you, smee, or anything, I'm just commenting on that Mugglcom thing. So know none of this is directed at you.

)
The only thing I find funny about all the shipping is how people do take it all so seriously. I mean, come on, they are books, and people are seriously getting hyped up about these things. Throwing insults is not something that needs to be happening. Sure I love debating, but is all the other stuff really necessary? I'm not going to stop reading the books if something I want to happen doesn't happen. I read the books because they're awesome (

) not to see who these teenageers wind up with. Can't we all just enjoy it?!?!
Omerus_Banning
Apr 5 2006, 03:57 PM
Thanks, Terran, for clearing that up... I always wondered....
As to ships, well, I'm one of the ones who never really saw any other ship being telegraphed throughout the books other than what we wound up with at the end of HBP. I thought from the very beginning that Ron and Hermione would get together at some point, all from that very first scene they have together on the Hogwarts Express. Harry, as the hero, in my mind was never really meant to have a "significant other". Then this business with Ginny came along... Well, I must admit I saw that coming too, just by the way she reacted to meeting Harry at the train station, and then by the way she reacted to Harry being at breakfast at the Weasleys'.
Having said that, I can certainly appreciate the theories put forth in support of the H/Hr ship. There is certainly a lot of things that make a lot of sense in a litterary sense and would point one towards that assumption. However, the author having the last word on the subject, I have to bow to what JKR has stated in the (in)famous interview.
I do think Harry and Luna would make an interesting couple. She does seem to have a way to make him think about what it is he is doing, about his motivations and goals. Plus, she's probably the funniest character out there, while being trustworthy and loyal... Would make for some great storylines, too... Imagine Harry meeting Luna's father?
Just my thoughts...
smee
Apr 6 2006, 08:43 PM
I really like how Luna makes Harry think; like at the end of OotP when she tells him that people take and hide her stuff. I think it makes Harry not just feel sorry for her but a little bit ashamed as well, after all; he used to call her Loony too. But I don't think this dynamic would neccessarily work better in a relationship. For all the stuff she says that challenges him she says something else that just makes absolutely no sense to him.
And Droobles, the front page of mugglecom wasn't particularly unbiased I will admit but the fact that Veelas Column was done in the style of West Side Story just had me in stiches; I can just imagine all the shippers clicking their fingers in a rythmic and aggressive manner at each other...
And I agree that whatever happens in the books is fine with me, the only reason I ship the way I do is because that's what Jo's written in the books; if she'd written H/Hr instead of R/Hr that would be fine; Ron and Hermione getting together wouldn't have even crossed my mind.
Louise
Apr 6 2006, 10:32 PM
| QUOTE |
| This spoof is hilarious. If you read nothing else on this site read Veelas Column (under Discussion on the left). So funny I almost wet myself. I know a lot of people take their shipping very seriously (me included) but you've got to be able to laugh at yourself and this is great! |
Yeah...

I ain't laughing.
I don't care about the ships - so what, I got it wrong, big deal. What really gets my goat is the assumption that all H/Hr's are thick or stupid for seeing what we did. I mean, come on, you don't exactly need to be Einstein to see the R/Hr bits. It's not like you guys had to look very hard - even JKR said they were "anvil sized". But we thought there was more to it than the surface stuff that seemed obvious - turns out what was obvious all along was right. Hey ho. Can't win 'em all. I guess there are radicals in both camps and it's the minority that give both our sides bad names. H/Hr's are delusional fantasists, R/Hr's are arrogant and rude...well, most people here aren't anywhere near either extreme, thankfully, which is why VTM is such a wonderful haven and we've worked very hard to make it so.
It's very easy to find something funny when you're not the target of the joke. I don't find it funny - but I'm not going to say anymore of what I really think of Emerson because I'm staff and it wouldn't be professional of me, but suffice it to say I've said plenty in the past. I'm glad not all R/Hr's are like him because if they were, I'd have left the fandom long ago.
The problem is, Droobles, that the ships are not the issue anymore. It's the attitude of the shippers themselves that are causing the problems now. Before, there was a friendly sort of banter - now, there's poking fun and downright open hostility, and most of that is from the R/Hr's directed at the H/Hr's and it's got nothing to do with the books anymore - it's one-upmanship, pure and simple. And it's rather pathetic and juvenile, IMHO.
Omerus - I, too, prefer Harry/Luna as a ship, definitely. I'm okay about R/Hr now, a plateau I've arrived at because I've decided that I want to enjoy the final book without thinking how much I hate the ships. Unfortunately, I haven't quite gotten there with regard to the H/G ship yet and I'm not sure I ever will because, back to the literary standpoint again, it was poorly done. Sorry, Jo...you know I love you, but it was poor.
I'm not expecting Darcy/Elizabeth, Heathcliff/Cathy, Brandon/Marianne...heck, I'm not even expecting Buffy/Angel, it's a children's book after all and not a great work of literature - but surely it's not asking too much for there to be at least
some consistency? Character development? Something?
Harry/Luna has depth and potential - a truly antithetical relationship. It's just a pity that it doesn't seem to be where Jo wants to go.
traz-ak
Apr 7 2006, 01:42 AM
I would entirely second Omerus's statements, as that has always been how I saw the situation precisely. But (there's always a but)... I am finally beginning to understand and appreciate the H/Hr side of things. I just never got it before (at least apart from the movies; I can feel the possibility in the movies, but those aren't canon, and I have other issues with the movies too, so... moving quickly back away from that...). I just never felt Harry and Hermione as a couple in the books, and didn't see how that relationship could come from at all. I still can't really see it happening. But at least now, I understand where the H/Hr come from. Thankyou, Louise, for opening my eyes to how that might work.
All that having been said... Even apart from JKR effectively telling us that the shipping issues are as good as settled... I would still be of the opinion that things in that area of the series are going to pretty much remain as they stand. The ships have never really been the main feature of HP, which I would suggest may be part of the reason (whether this makes it excusable or not) that they may not have been done as well as they could have been. They've just never been the point. And I can't help but feel like the major focus on them in HBP was more about getting all that out of the way than setting up for any further development. I'm fully expecting the final installment to be entirely focused on the task at hand, and any shipping that may be involved in it will likely be little more than an epilogue to whatever else happens.
Anyway, I've been meaning to get around to rereading the book again (it's been almost a year already since the last time), so that I can refresh my brain on all these debates (my ability to discuss HP seems to be waning at the moment, so I really need a refresher). I think this time, for once, I'm going to try to read it with the idea of H/Hr in mind, just to see if I can come more along on seeing it from the other perspective. I like that I can now better appreciate where that ship is coming from (I guess I must be going delusional too or something...

)
Omerus_Banning
Apr 7 2006, 03:16 PM
I tend to agree with Louise that the issue seems to have shifted from the sips themselves to the attitude of the various factions vis-a-vis other factions. I think pretty weel everyone has accepted the ships as JKR has decided to have them come out in the end, that is not at issue anymore (I think, anyway...) Personally, I first came to the Harry Potter books looking for entertainment, and my first reading of them (at least of the first two books) was definitely casual. As a result, I made connections based on the information as provided and made assumtions about ships based on that level of reading. Subsequent readings were more in depth, but I think the impressions I had gotten upon first reading the stories made too strong an impression for me to change my view of things. Call it a simple interpretation by a simple man.
Having said that, I find it deplorable to see that there is such venom between the various shipper factions, and a lot of it is not merely disagreeing about facts but casting aspersions on people's mental capacity for believing or having believed them. That is crossing a line. Surely we can all discuss theories, whatever they may be, look at the evidence the theory's proponents put forth in support of their view and exchange views and opinions in a civilized manner. Even if you don't agree with someone's interpretation of the facts doesn't mean that this person is stupid or delusional. It simply means that they are looking at the facts from a different perspective and perhaps drawing different conclusions from them. These differences of opinion should provide fertile ground for debate, not degenerate into vitriolic fratricide.
Ok, that was my rant.
Looking back now, I can't help but feel that I can't be the only one who is able to look at the arguments and see where H/Hr shippers were coming from. There's some pretty convincing evidence out there, and even though JKR made it abundantly clear H/Hr wasn't going to happen, I can't help but feel that there certainly was evidence supporting that ship.
I guess my point is that theories are meant to be debated. If you disagree with the theory, then poke at the theory, not at each other.
Capricorn
Apr 7 2006, 04:27 PM
Yes, I have to agree that the ships are (maybe luckily) something that didn't really grab my attention until HBP (although, now that I think back, I was kinda waiting for R/Hr to happen). The thing about non-canon theories is that, although sometimes far-fetched and sometimes not, they aren't always dead-ends.
There is always a reason behind someone thinking something, it doesn't just fall out of the blue because whoever is bored. I read the archived "Who is HBP' thread a few days ago, and it really opened up my eyes. I had never thought that people would have theories based on some form of evidence that suggest Crookshanks to be the HBP! It's true, and I love it. It made me wonder, not how unbelievably stupid some people are, no, but rather how incredibly narrow my view on Harry Potter is. It takes some creative spark to come up with any theory, and the evidence in the books are not necessarily good guidelines to go by. There was definitely more evidence pointing to Pettigrew being the HBP than Snape, and yet now it makes so much sense for it to be Snape.
The same could have been said for H/Hr. Only recently have I started seeing the possibilty as a workable one and I am sure that if Jo wanted to make H/Hr canon, she could still do it, because the two characters could work. They haven't changed. But yeah, she bashed that ship rather harshly, and it was unfair, especially if you look at how out-of-the-blue she had made H/G, imo. Double standards?
Anyhow, sitting back now, thankful that I have (by sheer luck and coincidence) missed most of the ship squabling.*phew*
Just the Droobles
Apr 7 2006, 05:09 PM
Ha...^^^iBROW...funny...sorry
I do agree with a lot that has been said. I can definitely see where the H/Hr shippers come from, though I do have to say I didn't really think what they saw was evidence of a ship. Guess that's just me though. H/Hr has quite a large fan base though it isn't really considered canon, and I don't think so many people would see that if there weren't things in the books that pointed them in that direction. Course I could say some of them only like that ship because they don't like Ron or Ginny, but that's kind of a stereotype. I have seen many shippers though who don't like those characters and therefore can't have them with their favorite character.
There's a lot of venom toward Ron I never really expected. I never really understood why really. Lots of people say he is mean to Hermione but I would beg to differ. Well, he is, I'm not going to deny that. But it only seems to be around Harry. And perhaps it just seems worse because it's from Harry's POV and it annoys him. Hermione hasn't always been kind to Ron either though. But hey, James and Lily fought and look how they ended up. There's tons of venom toward Ginny, and I was shocked at first but now reading people's arguments I know where they come from too. I still like Ginny, but I do understand that argument.
I kind of lost where I was going with all that. Was H/G really that out of the blue? I was a bit, you know, surprised he had feelings for her, but boys do mature mauch later than girls. Course he did have feelings for Cho starting in book three, but I think that was very highly based on looks. Harry had always been watching Ginny since the day he met her. He was a bit intrigued by her I'd say. Plus, she is a weasley, so I think he'd be naturally comfortable around her anyway. But was it really that sudden? I guess I need to start on the fifth book now that I'm done rereading the first four...
traz-ak
Apr 7 2006, 06:24 PM
| QUOTE |
| especially if you look at how out-of-the-blue she had made H/G, imo. |
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that count. The signs were there for a Harry/Ginny hook-up from the very first book (and much more in the second book). It was a lot more subtle than, say, Ron and Hermione (though not as subtle as Harry and Hermione, had that panned out), but it was there. In fact, now that I think back on it, I can recall being called something like "delusional" at least once way back after the first book when I first proposed to someone that Harry and Ginny were clearly going to get together some day. The other person just looked at me like I was insane, wondering where I'd gotten that from. But the evidence was most certainly there. I can see how it would seem out-of-the-blue if you didn't really consider it to be a real possibility, but I don't think it was really was out-of-the-blue at all.
Hmm... I feel like I had something else to say on one of the topics currently in discussion, but whatever it was seems to have been washed right out of my head.
muggleview
Apr 8 2006, 12:44 AM
I support Traz-ak that Harry/Ginny is actually prepared since Book 1. The relationship was deliberately developed very slowly and just on the border of the radar, that it makes one wonder whether it will play a big role in the last book. Anyway, Jo Rowling loves to pull surprises.
On the other hands, the interaction between Harry and Hermione was frequent, but it doesn't lead to the expected development or depth. It basically stays at the level of close friendship and professional partnership, but no romantic sparks. It made many start to look for other possibilities, such as Harry with another girl and Hermione with Ron.
Although the books deliberately didn't exploit Harry/Ginny since the beginning, one should see that among the Weasleys, Ginny was given a special place and special mentioning (in health and in sickness, for richer for poorer). Despite seemingly insignificant role, Jo insisted Ginny Weasley be shown in every movie. Movie 1 and 3 can easily skip her scenes. Even Mrs. Weasley can be absent in Movie 4 (although her role in book 4 is not insignificant). Not Ginny. Just saying "Good luck" and smiled in Movie 1. Or only pointed to the Fat Lady, Ginny's presence looked to be obligatory.
After given a very prominent role in Book 2, Jo seems eager to shield her from the readers' long-term memory by scarcely mentioning her in Book 3 and 4. Yet, any mentioning is not unimportant. At least, it shows that Harry Potter actually paid attention to her, who could have been easily ignored, because she almost turned to a deaf statue near Harry.
No, just like reading detective stories, the most important clues are usually presented very subtle in the beginning. The most obvious ones are just red-herring and distraction. Harry/Ginny relationship has been stretched softly in the books with just simple notion: Ginny was very taken with Harry and it was Harry who kept mentioning this to the reader. I know Jo has succeeded in putting this into the readers' subliminal mind. No avid reader misses this notion, and yet a huge number claims they couldn't see it before. It's there, but it seems not to be there until it's really there. Brilliant writing skill!